Talk:Baćin massacre/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 03:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

With very few, minor grammatical tweaks, the article subsequently complies with MOS policies for grammar and prose, as well as structuring and layout. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article contains a vast wealth of reputable, published sources, and makes very frequent use of them throughout the text. Nothing resembling original research, here. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 00:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to cover all aspects of the topic for which reliable, encyclopedic information was available. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 00:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article does indeed present its coverage of the topic in a neutral, unbiased tone. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Looking at the most recent edits in the article's history shows that it has not been subjected to any editing disputes since March, 2013, if not longer. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 20:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

All three of the article's images use valid licenses, are accepted by the Wikimedia Commons and thereby do not present a fair use problem, and also serve relevant illustrative purposes for the topic. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After reading through this article and making a few minor grammatical adjustments, I feel it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]