Talk:Aulos

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Musical Instruments Mid‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrument or component be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

Captured reed

Did it have a captured reed, like a practice chanter or crumhorn? Badagnani 22:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. It was not a windcap instrument. --Aaron Walden

08:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

The most recent edition of the Oxford Classical Dictionary suggests that the aulos and the tibia are the same instrument and treats them in the same article (3rd edition, p. 1005). The Wikipedia article Aulos already lists the Latin tibia in the lead. The only information that the article Tibiae contains that Aulos does not is the Ginsberg-Klar article. These articles ought to be merged. I would be happy to repair the disambiguation page and the cross-wiki links. Comments? Camenae (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nemo obstat. I shall redirect Tibiae and fold the meager information there into this article. Camenae (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mythic origin

This whole section seems to have been plagiarized. See "The Allegory to the Invisible Ring" sidebar here and this entire page. --Khajidha (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other way around, except the passage is attributed: the Church of California site cites Wikipedia as its source with a link at the bottom. I'm guessing the other one got it here as well, but please feel free to investigate further. Cynwolfe (talk) 16:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Missed the attribution. The passage still reads like an excerpt from an essay or thesis and not like an encyclopedia article ("we might surmise..."). --Khajidha (talk) 14:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Found this, but according to some other listings of the book it was compiled from various websites including wikipedia. This passage dates back to the earliest version of this page, but it just doesn't seem like it should be here. At least not in this form and this voice. --Khajidha (talk) 14:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I find that "we" very irritating: some scholars use first-person plural, I guess because they think of themselves as conversing with an inner circle, and so it creeps into WP. Agree with the criticisms. There should be plenty of RS to improve the article, so best wishes. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Related topic. The page blathers for awhile about the 19th century Apollonian v Dionysian distinction but the original myth seems much more straightforward. Midas was a king in Asia Minor; the myth seems to simply reflect a preference for different kinds of music in different areas. Right now, that's just WP:OR; be nice if somoene could be kind enough to find a scholar who's noticed the same point (if you have to write one, contact me so I can get coauthor status). — $Llywelyn II$ 09:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aulete

There's a stub on the aulete that has no sources. I don't see any reason to have a separate article on the player of the aulos. If someone wants to develop such an article, have at it, but for now I'm changing that stub to a redirect here. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:16, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Similar instruments

Are there any similar instrument like the aulos outside of Europe? Komitsuki (talk) 06:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aulos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050920113848/http://didaskalia.open.ac.uk:80/issues/vol2no2/Neuman.html to http://didaskalia.open.ac.uk/issues/vol2no2/Neuman.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edding

I could have done a better job at it. Kelly3479 (talk) 05:28, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More details, please

Was the aulos usually made of wood, bamboo, reeds, metal, bone? (I added "bone" because of the Latin word "tibia".) How was it made? How were the finger holes spaced?

Was only one pipe played, and the other pipe vibrated in resonance? Or did the aulete produce two notes simultaneously, one on each pipe?

Have archeologists come across auloi? If so, photographs would be nice, and a pointer to a musuem where one could see one.

Solo Owl 04:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Monaulos

The current version of this article says:

A single pipe without a reed was called the monaulos.

But I don't think that is accurate. Wasn't the monaulos actually a single (rather than double) aulos, with a double reed? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Royal Ontario Museum

The ROM has older evidence for the double flute than anything in this article.[1] Viriditas (talk) 11:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ROM statue is 600-480 BC. The Chigi vase, which is mentioned at the start of the "depictions in art" section is 650-640 BC. Furius (talk) 11:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does the date appear in this article? Viriditas (talk) 12:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]