Talk:Atlin, British Columbia

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I was in Atlin recently and will post some photos soon. Ghostreveries (talk) 17:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks in advance.....Skookum1 (talk) 18:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

It was proposed in this section that Atlin, British Columbia be renamed and moved to Atlin.

The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment.

Links: current log • target log

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus, not moved (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Atlin, British Columbia → Atlin – Although Atlin Lake is widely known, the town is the primarytopic for this name, which per Canadian disambiguation standards should have no comma-province disambiguation. Skookum1 (talk) 05:06, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. No proof that there is a primary topic and Canadian disambiguation standards don't override the need to prove that there is a primary topic especially with a dab page at the main namespace. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Well I'll see if I can winnow some google cites for you but it will be hard because of the town being on the lake and the District and other titles named for the town; all are intertwined. But there are lots of examples where a town/city/jurisdiction is the primary topic over the lake or river it's named after - Ontario vs Lake Ontario, Erie over Lake Erie, Michigan over Lake Michigan, Winnipeg over Lake Winnipeg and on a minor scale, Dawson Creek also (where the creek is unlikely to ever have an article).......and don't tell me OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - those are major precedents and serve as an example of existing conventions for PRIMARYTOPICS of this kind. Atlin is the only sizeable settlement (such as it is) in a corner of BC that's larger than West Virginia and other states, when someone says "I'm going to Atlin" they mean the town, though they wind up being at the lake too, and historically it's very high profile (during the Klondike Gold Rush, if you search the NYT archive, they called it "Atlin, Alaska. They weren't talking about the lake.Skookum1 (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - note today's RM for Talk:Dease Lake, British Columbia#Requested move which is of the same kind of issue, as is Cassiar, British Columbia#Requested move though not about a lake. I'm considering Williams Lake and Campbell River for the same reasons.Skookum1 (talk) 14:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

To DLE, your comment/reply on the Comox RM that I should "take it to Move Review" and your claim that such matters are subjective led me to take [[Atlin should be at least relisted, better yet it should be overturned by someone who does not rationalize a bad call as "subjective" when objective evidence abounds, as well as "local expertise" vs a "no proof" spurious objection from someone who's never heard of the place. CONSISTENCY re other town-titles and WP:CSG#Places are very, very clear, and were ignored by the opponent and the closer both; the close was improper, and the fuss and rigamarole of Move Review should not be necessary; nor should having to dig out stats for any of these have been needed simply because one editor has a complete lack of GF towards the proponent, who is acting on the consensual mandate of CANSTYLE, CANTALK, TITLE and more, and who happens to have expertise, a factor which seems regarded as less and less of value around here; even derided.|this to the RM talk page]], as given your reply on Comox there seems no point in asking you to relist this or change your decision; Comox, BC is now back on the table, however, at least via support of the participants (all but the usual "oppose" PRIMARYTOPIC-demander) at the Comox people RM. These are not subjective matters, objective data and informed input from persons with local expertise must be taken into account; if you are not prepared to look into the matter yourself, and to not query the oppose vote as to what other primarytopic there might be (in this case there is NO POSSIBLE OTHER primarytopic for teh stand-alone title), then you should not be closing RMs at all. If you don't know the subject matter, then indeed you are being "subjective" based on ignorance, not information.Skookum1 (talk) 15:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atlin, British Columbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130701030524/http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/station_metadata_e.html?StnId=1485 to http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/station_metadata_e.html?StnId=1485

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]