Talk:Artisan Entertainment

Fair use rationale for Image:Artisan.jpg

Image:Artisan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Article for Mr. Bloom

Mr. Bloom oughta have his own Wiki article, and why does he not? The man is a legend. Anyone have any suggestions? The Country Girl (talk) 15:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing films from filmography, including Reservoir Dogs

Is there a reason why a block of films are being repeatedly removed from this article? Our article on Reservoir Dogs, for example, lists Live Entertainment as the production company, and this article from Variety indicates that Live Entertainment did indeed provide funding. Also, this article indicates that Live Entertainment distributed Bad Lieutenant. And this article indicates that Live Entertainment financed Reservoir Dogs and Bad Lieutenant. I think this requires some kind of explanation from the IP. I guess I'll add a few citations. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what I see:

The Punisher: video distributor [1]
Drop Dead Fred: video distributor [2]
The Piano: video distributor [3]
Chicago Joe: can't find any citations
Fortress: can't find any citations, but I think this was direct-to-video
Glengarry: video distributor [4]
Tom and Jerry: video distributor [5]

I guess we could remove all of them, but why not just label Live as the video distributor? Further, this article also says that they produced Bob Roberts, Reservoir Dogs, and Bad Lieutenant. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:15, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have found this source for Chicago Joe.Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 01:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have also found this source for Fortress.Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 02:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to throw in my two cents, but I also suspect that the IPs who have been doing these edits came from Faster2010 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), an indef-blocked user who has created hoaxes to articles like these (a sockpuppet case has been filed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Faster2010). Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have a source to show that Live/Artisan also distributed The House of the Spirits (film)? Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]