Jump to content

Talk:ArenaNet/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Date

Sometings is wrong, you have two dates of foundation. One in the text and the other in the box at right. ­­---TulipVorlax 01:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I went by the website - spring 2000. –Pomte 16:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Anet?

Somebody spelled it wrong, should be "Anerf". just kidding but seriously, anyone planning on buying this game should know there is a lvl 20 cap that is easily reached, there is no z axis in the game (you can hit people under a bridge if you are on top of the bridge) no jumping too, and this game has a constantly shifting imbalance in the game. Also you can NEVER meet anyone outside of town, ALL explorable areas are instanced. And game play bugs take a looooong time to get fixed. (9 month standing bug involving doors) 66.45.173.98 (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

This article is about the company - only a high-level summary of the games it makes should be here. Game details belong in the game articles, or in the series article at Guild Wars (series). --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 18:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
still the most balanced, competitive and pvp oriented rpg out there, also you write that all as negative stuff, no reason for that, gw is an innovative mmo unlike all others, bugs are fixed fast after game updates and only very minor bugs stay in the game for long time.. 86.101.134.142 (talk) 11:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Headcount

The number of employees as of Q4 08 is now 163. You can find that in NCsoft's Q4 financial report PDF at the end: Clicky. I'm not changing the page, because I think someone else will place the source better :( 83.26.92.66 (talk) 18:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

CORPG

the article says " The developers call this blend a CORPG, short for competitive online role-playing game."

Didn't they call it a "cooperative online role-playing game" ? 202.72.135.193 (talk) 04:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Should we remove redundant info?

I dont think there is any need to have a description of the titles. Since they have their own wiki, we should just list them and add the link so if somebody wants details they can just click it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.140.135.196 (talk) 13:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Rytlock's Critter Rampage Title

 In the Titles section, Rytlock's Critter Rampage game is not mentioned.

Mahri726 (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ArenaNet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on ArenaNet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)