Jump to content

Talk:Apu Nahasapeemapetilon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 22 September 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Apu NahasapeemapetilanApu Nahasapeemapetilon – Undiscussed move: looking at [1] alone, it would appear that the new article title has no results on page 1 alone. I don't think that was ever moved to the new title in the first place. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:25, 22 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ‡ Night Watch ω (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, I didn't say his last name is unknown – only that most people aren't aware of it. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:42, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies. I mis-worded it and really meant that I think it's well-known enough to probably be part of the page title, similar to Nelson Muntz. Skynxnex (talk) 23:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed reduction of Controversy Section

[edit]

The section about Apu's controversies is extremely bloated. It's longer than the character biography, by my count. I propose we trim away a good chunk of it - specifically the paragraphs related to the documentary and its fallout - and wanted to see if there were any objections beforehand. Daniel P Botes (talk) 01:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean Apu Nahasapeemapetilon § Accusations of racial stereotyping? I think there's nothing particularly wrong about such a section being longer than the character biography. The things that occurred in the real world because of the character are probably more "encyclopedic" than the fictional elements. That said, it is probably a bit over detailed about the documentary, yeah. Selectively merging some to the docu article, if needed, and removing some excessive detail here would be fine. Skynxnex (talk) 14:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]