Talk:Antz
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antz article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References to use
[edit]- Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
- Barker, Martin; Austin, Thomas (2000). "'An Ant With Ideas...'". From Antz To Titanic: Reinventing Film Analysis. Pluto Press. pp. 72–86. ISBN 0745315844.
DVD Release
[edit]Is there a DVD release of Antz in the works? -User:Angie Y.
Anthem and Antz
[edit]I had an English teacher who used the movie Antz in conjunction with the story anthem, mostly with the parallels of a society that focuses on the society at the expense of the individual, the practice of people being pre-selected for their careers, forbidden love, and main characters who question society. Has anyone else heard of this?
Compgeek86 16:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
I have... I've read both books and it resembles Anthem FAR more closely than Brave New World. The plot structure follows Anthem also exactly, though the implied epilogue of Anthem is the climax of Antz. There are additional parallels, but the themes far match Anthem more closely as well. 24.8.44.219 (talk) 22:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Plot summary
[edit]At over 1300 words, the plot summary had been tagged as overlong. I've replaced it with a briefer version from an older revision of the article [1]. --Tony Sidaway 10:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Antz-poster.jpg
[edit]Image:Antz-poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
antz ending credits
[edit]directed by ERIC DARNELL TIM JOHNSON produced by BRAD LEWIS ARON WARNER PATTY WOOTON executive producers PENNEY FINKELMAN COX SANDRA RABINS CARI ROSENDAHL screenplay by TODD ALCOTT CHRIS WEITZ & PAUL WEITZ music by |- | WON || Best Computer Animation Film of 1998 || Gene Hackman accepted it |- |}
These weren't Annie Award categories [2]. It may be the case that they were real awards from some other organization ("2-Star Comedy" sounds a bit facetious), but I cannot find evidence of this. BuilderQ (talk) 16:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Removed category philosophical film
[edit]I removed this films status as a philosophical film due to lack of evidence of such. --Deleet (talk) 22:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- This change can be reverted. Evidence here. A LIST OF PHILOSOPHICAL FILMS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deleet (talk • contribs) 22:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
A section for themes?
[edit]So on most pages that have one, the "Themes" section is one of my favorite sections to read. Personally, I love Antz for its witty and insightful political and social commentary. What does everyone think about adding such a section? Captain Stack (talk) 02:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- A "Themes" section is a good idea! Have you done research for a film's themes before? One possible reference is listed above. I did some additional research and found the following references too: 1, 2, and 3. Here is another; Google Scholar Search indicates that Antz is one of the four animated films studied. Let me know if you need some tips on how to find these references to cite for the Wikipedia article! Erik (talk | contribs) 13:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Antz/A bug's life dispute
[edit]There is a massive amount about this fairly notable dispute on the page A Bug's Life, but nothing here at all. I can understand that there is no point duplicating the material, but surely a section on this page, even if it only contains a link, is necesary. It seems to be taking sides, almost, saying on one page "Pixar got shafted" and then totally ignoring the issue here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.30.133.31 (talk) 00:22, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Worker ants are females
[edit]Wouldn't it be more proper to use 'she' when talking about Z? --79.8.190.228 (talk) 13:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
The Ants were portrayed in that film as being genderless, some taking on more masculine forms and some taking more feminine forms. --Termitesoldier9 (talk) 22:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Termite battle
[edit]I'm confused about the termite thing. So did the termite army, like, really, turn against the ant colony or did Mandible just make that up to get rid of all those poor soldiers? -- 71.184.94.189 (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Producers
[edit]The article says "Antz is a 1998 American computer animated adventure comedy film produced by DreamWorks Animation" yet the infobox lists Pacific Data Images as the production company. Which one is the production company or is it both? In the meantime I will add DreamWorks Animation to the infobox. Feel free to revert (or tell me to do it) if I am wrong. Infor4fun (talk) 09:14, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Production
[edit]Dreamworks didn't buy Pacific Data Images till 2000. When this was in production, the two companies were only partners.174.21.56.40 (talk) 04:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Evan Kalani Opedal
American Film Institute recognition
[edit]The reference of the infomation about AFI's 10 Top 10 nomination is not valid yet. Please, allow me to change it to this link: [1]. Dr.saze (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ "AFI's Top 10 Animation Nominees". Retrieved 2016-08-12.
Plot Summary 2016
[edit]I might need help of trimming the plot to between 400 - 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT if anyone's around. TPercival (talk) 17:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Done. It's around 680 words now, which is within the guideline's range. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Discussion about having this article protected again
[edit]This article has been vandalized by some anonymous users. I am having second thoughts of requesting this article to be protected. Who thinks that the article should be protected or not? Feel free to reply back if you agree or disagree. TPercival (talk) 11:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
"Second feature-length computer-animated film after Disney/Pixar's Toy Story"
[edit]Are you sure? Wasn't that Cassiopeia? That was released a few months after Toy Story, and two years before Antz Dpm12 (talk) 10:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Sarah Jessica Parker
[edit]In this interview here, Sarah Jessica Parker talks about how she was fired from the movie, and replaced with Sharon Stone. Aoba47 (talk) 02:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
I want to add a section in “Release” for Marketing
[edit]The first thing in the section will be:
Playmates Toys released a line of action figures to coincide with the film’s release, consisting of Z, Princess Bala, Weaver, General Mandible, and Colonel Cutter. 166.181.83.246 (talk) 13:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Condense this article?
[edit]There are a lot of instances where whole sentences and paragraphs, including quotes from film executives have been copied and pasted in multiple sections of this article complete with annotation numbers. All of these instances do not add anything of substance to this article. It's just repeating stuff over and over again under different subsection titles. I suggest someone well versed in how a Wikipedia article should read, go through this whole article and clean up the repeated information. RyanConnell5150 (talk) 01:30, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Jennifer Lopez articles
- Low-importance Jennifer Lopez articles
- WikiProject Jennifer Lopez articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- C-Class Animated films articles
- Unknown-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class Animation articles
- High-importance Animation articles
- C-Class Animation articles of High-importance
- C-Class American animation articles
- High-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- High-importance Animated films articles
- C-Class Computer animation articles
- High-importance Computer animation articles
- Computer animation work group articles
- C-Class DreamWorks Animation articles
- High-importance DreamWorks Animation articles
- DreamWorks Animation work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- C-Class Comedy articles
- Low-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Unknown-importance American animation articles
- Unknown-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles