Jump to content

Talk:Angelo (Measure for Measure)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dmartin41.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page Improvements

[edit]

Changing the word "commute" to "rescind" seems to make more sense - the word commute does not make sense in this context at all Jterrazzino (talk) 02:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This page seems to be very underdeveloped. It leaves out large portions of the plot in ways that make the character description and story line very confusing to follow. Jterrazzino (talk) 02:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The description of Angelo does not provide much information about who he is as a character. It only provides a very brief and rather poorly written summary of events that the character of Angelo is a part of. Jterrazzino (talk) 02:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added a few commas, removed the word "but" from the beginning of a sentence because it was unnecessary and a poor way to frame the sentence, and added a period at the end of the character analysis. Jterrazzino (talk) 08:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this page is underdeveloped and also not cited correctly. The only citation on this page is for the play itself, but not for the performance history. Also because nothing it cited, I assume that the analysis portion was the author's own conclusions, so therefore this should be omitted. ----

The performance section of this article has no citations, so there is no proof that any of the information in this section is accurate.Maggie N Joyce (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The statement that Angelo "is often viewed as a controversial character" needs to be elaborated on and needs to have a citation. Otherwise the statement is too broad, and since it does not say who is "viewing" him this way, this statement cannot be verified.Maggie N Joyce (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]