Talk:Angel Attack

Angel Attack has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 8, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

You know, rewatching it....the first episode is one of the goofiest cliche anime episodes ever made. Maybe it's just that the ADV dub voice actors are kind of new to their roles (Misato is more excited than usual), but all of the "oh my God, it's impossible for Eva 01 to move but miraculously it did!" moments are kind of silly. Episode 2 is better, but Misato's english dub "it tore through the AT Field like it wasn't even there!" is kind of grating. Amazingly, the show does get exponentially better with each episode, and of course by episode 8 and Asuka, it's the best stuff ever made. --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 21:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I watched it last night...in Japanese. It purposefully skewers the opening of the original Gundam, acutally, down to Shinji reading a manual on NERV. No, I think it's a great episode, though I agree that the dub was a little bad early on. Xenofan 29A 04:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment scale

Isn't this article one of the -B quality articles in the assessment scale? I mean, it is currently discribed as starter page but it has almost every kind of info you can pull out of the episode. I see little for improvement. (There are some however suchs as external references and maybe even some links to other websites that cover this episode aswell as Wikipedia. I don't know. Open for discussion.) ;) This also applies for all NGE episodes up to episode 24, but copy/pasting this post on every talk page of every episode article is a bit over the top I guess. ;)
Kind regards, --MisteryX 06:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is just opposed to the level of "Analysis" that I put into writing these up. A dedicated EvaWiki is in the works, so just hang on. --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 23:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Angel Attack/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 13:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article. Good work so far.Tintor2 (talk) 13:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TeenAngels1234:

First of all. The article is kinda Wikipedia:Orphan. Barely 39 articles link it here including talk pages. I would suggest adding the template of Evangelion to the bottom alongside the link of this episode.

I'm currently planning the creation of a template per sé, just like the various episode list from Adventure Time or The Simpsons. Can you wait, while I create other articles and put a more appropriate template?

- Okay.
Is it possible to show a nonfree image for the infobox? Maybe something from the production that stands out or Anno's favorite scene?

Lead

The lead seems a bit small considering the content of the article. I would suggest an elaboration of the development of the episode or what part of the episode is more notable like the usage of weaponry or designs.
Same with the reception's area from the lead. Rather than pointing out reviwers I would consider using a generalization like you did with the other Evangelion characters.

Plot

Misato needs a brief introduction
"named Evangelion, where he is shown Evangelion 01" This might need some clarification. What's the difference between Evangelion and 01? I mean, both are linked. I'm pretty sure it means a series of robots with the same name like Gundams.

Production

Considering the importance of the creators I would suggest linking Anno rather than the weapons unless you put a template for multiple free images.

What do you mean? Put a picture that portrays Anno?

- Yeah, he is the most notable person discussed in the article and has free image in contrast to the other references.

Reception

I would suggest trimming some quotes and instead paraprhase some responses. It happened to me once when an edit I once made to an article got erased.

Anyways, that's all I found so far. I doubt I might find other issues but ping me when you are finished with this. Good work in the article. Also if possible, could you check this peer review when the review is over? RegardsTintor2 (talk) 18:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Tried my best with the rest.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 22:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TeenAngels1234: Passing My issues were solved. I still think that you should at least link the episode to the Evangelion template. No rush needed. Kinda like the Pokemon articles that have some animated episodes.Tintor2 (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]