Talk:Android Dev Phone

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Criticism?

The criticism section doesn't really contain any criticism. Just more facts about the conditions of the phone's use.97.83.127.57 (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, the rivals section seems completely unnecessary, and reads like an advertisement. Mathiastck (talk) 17:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

If somebody's corrections are reverted without explication or consideration, than people will not be too keen to make contributions.

bilal Bilal925 (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ADP 3 & ADP 4

--88.111.116.197 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)+ Add a ADP 3 'n' a ADP 4 section p.s they are hust rebranded devives like the ADP & the ADP 2--88.111.116.197 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)--88.111.116.197 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)--88.111.116.197 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)--88.111.116.197 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)--88.111.116.197 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)--88.111.116.197 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)--88.111.116.197 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)--88.111.116.197 (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tense

Should this article be put in past tense? It currently is in a present tense and makes the information seem current, specifically in regards to the price of the device (which I doubt is being sold anymore). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blitzvergnugen (talk • contribs) 12:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a Nexus 4 section

The construction of the article seems to have been halted sometime before the Nexus 4 was even released. Thank you. 166.137.209.18 (talk) 03:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Android Dev Phone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]