This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women
Amy Webb is within the scope of WikiProject Indiana, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for, and sustain comprehensive coverage of the U.S. state of Indiana and related subjects on Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies
I'd been poised to delete this as failing WP:GNG, but Webb has put out a book that seems to just push her past notability guidelines. I'd debated making an article for the book and redirecting there, but the coverage is fairly light so far and this would be best served as a section in this article. If the book gains more publicity with Valentine's Day coming up, we can create a separate article or debate redirecting Webb's article there.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)10:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd agree with that assessment. I originally put up the notability tag, because if every Digital Media consultant or "Future Thinker" had a page, Wikipedia would have forty thousand resumes. Just graduating Ivy League and starting a business does not rate an article. Likewise, not every author should have a page; there are millions of authors with out-of-print books who don't get a page. If this book has legs after two years, I'd say keep. --Bridgecross (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
She's gained some coverage so far, but most of it is more about her commenting about how to game the dating website system rather than about her or her book. I'm still somewhat ambivalent about whether it should be kept or not. It's kind of right at the cusp of pass/fail. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)17:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the persona she portrays in her essays on Slate certainly is. If there is some reaction to her style in reliable third-party sources, that may be of interest. Jonathunder (talk) 03:34, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Revisiting this. For me it's still on the cusp. Perhaps it wouldn't be so problematic if the article didn't read like a LinkedIn profile. How many author pages have a headshot and so much professional detail? Even a hint of self-serving intent in an article should raise red flags. --Bridgecross (talk) 15:08, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
