A fact from Alexandra Pinell appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiki Loves Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women in Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Wiki Loves WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Loves WomenTemplate:WikiProject Wiki Loves WomenWiki Loves Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Costa Rica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Costa Rica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Costa RicaWikipedia:WikiProject Costa RicaTemplate:WikiProject Costa RicaCosta Rica
This article was created or improved during the following events hosted by the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment Well, question, about the picture. There are two equally-prominent people in it, should it not be cropped? Adding (left) to the caption would solve the 'which one' issue, but it's still a photo of two people. Kingsif (talk) 02:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@evrik: New enough and long enough – foreign-language sports digital news sourcing is difficult for me to assess. Hook fails interestingness requirement narrowly, although I suppose I could stamp it if we included somehow that Pinell's team hosted the tournament. QPQ has been done, need someone else to assess the sourcing. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@evrik: introduces more problems than it fixes – now it seems like we're assigning our opinion to said goal to be a "golazo". What is the sentence "That one "golazo" lit the internet on fire for its improbability" doing in the article? That seems like editorializing. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Quoting the source, "Alexandra Pinell has set the internet ablaze with one of the most incredible and mind-boggling goals in recent memory." --evrik(talk)02:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We can't express that opinion in wikivoice, it needs to be attributed inline. That's assuming that it is a reliable source at all, which I'm not certain of. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
New enough and long enough – foreign-language sports digital news sourcing is difficult for me to assess. Hook fails interestingness requirement narrowly, although I suppose I could stamp it if we included somehow that Pinell's team hosted the tournament. QPQ has been done, need someone else to assess the sourcing. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
