Talk:Akiba-kei

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Japan: Culture / Tokyo C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 04:12, January 2, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Culture task force.

This article is supported by the Tokyo task force.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Tried to wikify

Tried to wikify but the article is short and poorly written. Some further information and detail in writting is needed. --Dananimal 00:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did an overhaul edit...is it better? TleilaxuFD (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The tone of this article still isn't up to Wikipedia standards. It's also poorly referenced, and what few citations are there are mostly dead links to the same site with no real details in the citation. V2Blast (talk) 22:44, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]