Talk:Aimée Crocker

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 27 June 2010 by reviewer Oo7565 (talk · contribs).

Photos

Could someone fix the photos in this article? I am not so experienced at changing/updating/finding photographs. There has to be some out there as she seems quite infamous.Toyz1988 (talk) 22:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

= I really agree, there must be photos of her contemporaries mentioned in the article too. Adam Cuerden is really good at this stuff.

I think Aimee is a very historically significant person, as she lived a life that presaged the future of what women were "allowed" and able to do by 100 years or more. The article as written is charming, but I will attempt to tidy up some of the language, which is not "wiki style", although it appears quoted from a source. If the citations were there, I would leave it.

I wish the front page had a feature article spot for articles on important subjects that need work, not just ones meeting good quality criteria. We have too many beautifully written articles on unimportant people or war battles. To many diamonds in the rough of significant parts of the human experience.

cheers Billyshiverstick (talk) 01:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let's start with the library of Congress - usually a good choice for American subjects.

https://www.loc.gov/item/ggb2005015290/ is in the artcile; it's available in much better resolution. It's not a particularly great image, but it has her with one of her husbands, which gives it uniqueness.

https://www.loc.gov/item/ggb2005021111/ is probably rejectable.
https://www.loc.gov/item/ggb2004006021/ is pretty good.
https://www.loc.gov/item/ggb2004006825/ has an advantage fo being unique. Would rather use the painting itself, but it doesn't appear to be publicly available.

I'm inclined to keep the current lead image, and the image of her children; as for the rest.... Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 02:59, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]