Jump to content

Talk:African historiography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Important Accounts For pre 1500 Historiography Africa

[edit]

Most Important Accounts 196.191.61.187 (talk) 17:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Historians general view of oral traditions.

[edit]

I'm dubious about the claim that "It used to be thought that oral traditions had a core of truth, however this has changed and the core is now considered a cliché..." when you have a 2018 article whose abstract begins with: "Oral traditions are considered as a reliable source of historical writing.". Perhaps the reference for this paragraph is outdated or more exposition of the different viewpoints is needed. Zoocat56 (talk) 23:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn’t consider the age of the source. The source discusses truth and myth, saying it used to be thought they had a core of truth and a penumbra of myth. This source also says the same as the one you provided. I’ll try to find a more recent source that discusses the literature, and delete the contested stuff for now Kowal2701 (talk) 08:32, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find a tertiary source on this, however there are still books from 2017 arguing for respect of oral tradition as historical sources, implying this is still debated Kowal2701 (talk) 09:52, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The 2017 book is actually a reprint of the English translation of Jan Vansina's original 1961 book De la tradition orale—for some reason Google Books lists the wrong author. For methods and sources used by historians of Africa this 2005 book supplanted with this book review might be useful. Zoocat56 (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah that's embarrassing. That book looks great, and it can be accessed through the Wikipedia Library! Thanks so much, that'll be so useful Kowal2701 (talk) 20:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]