Talk:Adobe GoLive

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adobe GoLive article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Graphic design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Don't use past tense

I already wrote this comment on another article about the use of past tense and repeat it here because I noticed the same mistake:

"Adobe GoLive was a WYSIWYG HTML editor"

No, it is. The software is discontinued, but still usable and existing. Don't use past tense in articles for soft- and hardware, unless the functionality is completely broken because it needs access to a defunct website or similar. Unlike humans, software can't die and there are people out there who still use old versions. Formicula (talk) 10:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt on "In place of GoLive, Adobe will bundle Macromedia Dreamweaver"...

Adobe didn't announce what it would give up GoLive. With a different workflow, GoLive excels Dreamweaver in a lot of ways, most significantly its integration with other Creative Suite applications.

There is still speculations on whether GoLive or Dreamweaver will be given up. They may largely coexist and serve different purpose in the foreseeable future.

I agree. I have been using both software since 1999 and since 2001 been using GoLive only, notwithstanding the new feartures offered by Dreamwevaer MX. GoLive has more features that enhances the look and feel of the webpage. In addition, the CSS feature of GoLive is very impressive.

- Actually, Adobe did replace GoLive with Dreamweaver CS3 (now considered an Adobe product, after merging with Macromedia.) This was do to the fact that web designers have long adopted Dreamweaver as the industry standard, and GoLive had never achieved much penetration in the market.

--What needs to be clarified here is that when Adobe acquired GoLive, it did not also own Dreamweaver: Dreamweaver was a Macromedia product and Adobe did not acquire Macromedia until 2005. So it isn't that Adobe had always had these 2 similar products, it's that Adobe came to have these similar products at the point of the acquisition of Macromedia.

Version history

If someone could add a version history (release dates), I'd be most grateful. 217.85.169.131 07:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Company history

I do not remember if there ever was a gonet, Inc.. gonet communications GmbH was founded in Feb 1996 in Hamburg, Germany. A year later we had to change our name to GoLive Systems GmbH. If I remember correctly this was the time when GoLive Inc. was founded in Menlo Park, CA. mprove (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adobe GoLive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100804095513/http://www.adobe.com/devnet/golive/ to https://www.adobe.com/devnet/golive/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adobe GoLive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070323064143/http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200609/091806CreativeSuite.html to https://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200609/091806CreativeSuite.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]