From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Mathematics Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics Template:WikiProject Mathematics mathematics Low This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale .
In the final section of the section "General case", I am pretty sure that there is a substantial error. It is said that
⟨
∇
j
(
v
)
,
δ
v
⟩
=
d
v
j
(
v
;
δ
v
)
=
d
v
L
(
u
v
,
v
,
λ
v
;
δ
v
)
.
{\displaystyle \langle \nabla j(v),\delta _{v}\rangle =d_{v}j(v;\delta _{v})=d_{v}{\mathcal {L}}(u_{v},v,\lambda _{v};\delta _{v}).}
The last equality seems to be wrong. From the second equation from the Lagrange multiplier ansatz we instead find
⟨
∇
j
(
v
)
,
δ
v
⟩
=
d
v
j
(
v
;
δ
v
)
=
d
v
J
(
u
v
,
v
;
δ
v
)
=
−
⟨
d
v
D
v
(
u
v
;
δ
v
)
,
λ
v
⟩
.
{\displaystyle \langle \nabla j(v),\delta _{v}\rangle =d_{v}j(v;\delta _{v})=d_{v}J(u_{v},v;\delta _{v})=-\langle d_{v}D_{v}(u_{v};\delta _{v}),\lambda _{v}\rangle .}
The example in the linear case should be changed accordingly. To be specific, instead of
⟨
∇
j
(
v
)
,
δ
v
⟩
=
⟨
A
u
v
,
δ
v
⟩
+
⟨
∇
v
B
v
:
λ
v
⊗
u
v
,
δ
v
⟩
,
{\displaystyle \langle \nabla j(v),\delta _{v}\rangle =\langle Au_{v},\delta _{v}\rangle +\langle \nabla _{v}B_{v}:\lambda _{v}\otimes u_{v},\delta _{v}\rangle ,}
it should read
⟨
∇
j
(
v
)
,
δ
v
⟩
=
⟨
A
u
v
,
δ
v
⟩
=
−
⟨
∇
v
B
v
:
u
v
⊗
δ
v
,
λ
v
⟩
.
{\displaystyle \langle \nabla j(v),\delta _{v}\rangle =\langle Au_{v},\delta _{v}\rangle =-\langle \nabla _{v}B_{v}:u_{v}\otimes \delta _{v},\lambda _{v}\rangle .}