Talk:Adithya Srinivasan
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Gham e Duniya
[edit]WP:NSONG: "articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album" Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- That's because his article is a lot bigger than a stub. (Note: This was in reply to this post removed by its author) Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Artist Discographies grow over time & each song/album released has a good amount of significance. Today it might be a single track but soon more tracks would be released with pages for each, it would not be correct to merge each page then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.178.201.161 (talk) 06:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- That's not a discography page. That's a page about just the one track. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Then why not merge In My City with Priyanka Chopra? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.178.201.161 (talk) 08:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- That's a much bigger article. Gham e Duniya will never grow that big. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Songs do not cease to exist after their release. More and more press articles, citations & awards come with time and Wikipedia allows articles to grow only with sufficient references for each, thus page must remain! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.178.201.161 (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's unlikely that will happen. If it ever does, the page can be re-split. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
We are nobody to judge what is likely and what is not, the only thing certain about life is death! Merging & again re-splitting the pages is a futile effort and can be left as it is since no harm is being caused by any means! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.178.201.161 (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
So what is the decision of this suggestion? Merge or Separate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.167.204.75 (talk) 16:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Since you and I are the only ones to have commented on it, there's no decision yet. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Adithya Srinivasan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203020411/http://skore.in/post/66190554996/we-talked-to-the-rising-star-of-ghazal-aditya to http://skore.in/post/66190554996/we-talked-to-the-rising-star-of-ghazal-aditya
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203002513/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/130721/entertainment-tvmusic/article/words-ghalib to http://www.deccanchronicle.com/130721/entertainment-tvmusic/article/words-ghalib
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://epaper.deccanchronicle.com/articledetailpage.aspx?id=124716 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to https://globalvima.com/2016/05/02/vima-music-awards-final-nominees/ - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to https://sg.linkedin.com/in/adithyasrinivasan
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)