This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland
There is an advertisement template there which I tried to justify to then try to correct where possible. Yet I didn't find anything significant that would make this ảrticle look like promotion to me. Could someone please clarify this to me, maybe I miss something. Or is that template wrong there? ----Bartholomeow7 (talk) 09:06, April 17 2023 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The Adecco Group → Adecco – The use of the leading "the" and the suffix (group) in RS is mixed, with no evidence that it is considered an integral part of the name. The two moves (in 2016 and 2017), while following official naming of the company (WP:OFFICIAL) are thus inconsistent with English Wikipedia titling conventions, both in general ([WP:UCRN]], WP:CONCISE) and company specific (WP:NCCORP), which indicate that such prefixes and suffixes should not be included where not required to fully identify the topic to a person familiar with the general subject area. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
