Jump to content

Talk:Active shutter 3D system/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Biased Commercialised Information

XPanD seem to have gotten to this page to make it a big marketing campaign. They were not the first to mass market with affordable 3D shutter glass solutions. One of the first were eDimensional (www.edimensional.com), and they have had shutter glasses since the early 2000's.

121.54.17.50 (talk) 03:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC) Concerned User

I fully agree - their advertising was EVERYWHERE. I've cleaned up the article a bit, and removed most of it, but have given them a fair mention along with other manufacturers (Panasonic, and nVidia, etc)
DRAGON Elemental (talk) 12:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I suppose then that the dispute is solved. I am removing the notice in the main article. --Pot (talk) 09:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Privacy function

Has the privacy function mentioned ever been implemented in actual fact? -Toptomcat 02:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Don't know if it's actually been implemented, but it's definitely possible. --71.52.212.42 17:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Commercial releases

I think this article would do well with a list of commercial releases of LCD shutter glasses (some have been released for Nintendo Famicom, Sega Master System, Commodore Amiga, and modern PC systems, as well as some systems that allowed people to view 3D VHS cassettes). Anyone agree or disagree? Student Driver 18:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Like this! http://www.stereo3d.com/shutter.htm 193.167.33.60 (talk) 07:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
The Amiga version was called X-Specs3D
http://www.amiga-hardware.com/showhardware.cgi?HARDID=769
These were the ones in the picture right next to the part that says Japan only. I had a set and I'm on the other side of the planet from Japan.Bofum (talk)

materal used in shutter glasses

Does anybody knows what material used in shutter glasses? What kind of LCD is it?--Farbiz 03:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

The earliest I've heard of used lead tartrate, but they needed quite a high voltage (see here: http://forums.reghardware.co.uk/forum/1/2009/10/28/ddd_acer_3d_laptop/#) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.169.32 (talk) 16:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Page moved recommended

Although the term LCD shutter glasses is in common usage, the correct term is LC shutter glasses. There is no "display" in the glasses. This doesn't seem to be a frequently updated page so I will move it unless someone has objections Julien Flack 14:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Move I agree wholeheartedly. Unless I hear objections otherwise I will move to do this in about a week. This page would become a disambiguation page (or correction) and the current content would be moved to LC shutter glasses. Andrew Woods 19 Nov 2008 —Preceding undated comment was added at 12:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC).

Keep I object. Most people call them "LCD shutter glasses", so that's where the article should be. --Carnildo (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Move Move to LC shutter glasses. Encyclopedia should give correct information. The better term "LC shutter glasses" is in use, for example "Q: Why are active LC shutter glasses required?", "This is a wireless Infrared LC Shutter Glasses System...". Tero (talk) 15:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Move I agree it should move, to present the proper terminology, with a redirect from here retained for those few lost souls who would otherwise not find it. Karora 21:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Stay The page should NOT move. Even researchers who use these systems call them LCD shutter glasses. 15:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.162.102.225 (talk)
Move I believe this page should 100% move. We must do our best to be technically accurate, and a redirect from this old page (LCD) to the new (LC) is the way to go. If we don't move it, then people who come across this page will be learning false information, that they will then spread - eventually leading to the entire world calling them LCD shutter glasses! It's now or never! DRAGON Elemental (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Move The title is incorrect because the shutter glasses are not only for LCDs but also for plasma, and DLP (LCD seem to be the most problematic display type for shutter glasses.) I support moving. Andries (talk) 12:03, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
I've already voted for the move - but just to clarify Andries' comment: The "LCD" in "LCD shutter glasses"(sic) has never referred to the type of display the glasses are used with. Shutter glasses were first developed in the time of CRTs - it is only recently that they can be used with LCDs (and PDPs, DLPs and OLEDs). The "LC" in "LCD shutter glasses"(sic) refers to the fact that Liquid Crystal cells are used in each eyepiece of the glasses. The "D" in "LCD shutter glasses"(sic) is simply incorrect because the glasses themselves are not a display. I believe the "LCD" in "LCD shutter glasses"(sic) just comes from the fact that people are used to saying LCD (with regard to TVs, watches, monitors) without realising what it really means. Awoods3d (talk) 06:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Move if my voice counts - yes - to move it to LC shutter glasses - this is wikipedia, not ordinary forum, so yes - people should know proper terminology - and it's common thing in paper encyclopedia, if you look for something you will find it even if it's moved. since it's correlated. 212.76.37.152 (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC) filip kovcin, poland
Move I vote to move this article and to make LCD shutter glasses a redirect page to the correctly titled LC shutter glasses article. Spiral5800 (talk) 05:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Don't know LCD seems more common, but LC more correct. I guess Wikipedia should reflect common usage, not be prescriptive. But both are commonly used so... Dunno. Anyway I added Active shutter glasses which redirects to the main page, so it should be updated too if a move is decided. --Kai Carver (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Move since most opinions are for move, I am moving it. --Pot (talk) 09:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Color bending

Currently, the article says that "color bending" can typically be seen with polarized 3D systems. Is this true? And what exactly does this mean? Angel Cupid (talk) 20:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

nVidia 3D Vision

shold be nVidia 3D Vision glasses meant in this article? http://www.nvidia.com/object/GeForce_3D_Vision_Main.htmlPeter.Hozak (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Neutrality

The section I tagged seems to extoll the virtues of DLP without thoroughly examining the other available options and explaining why they are inferior; it only talks about what makes DLP so great. Do others agree that, if the section is going to say DLP is best, it should thoroughly explain other options and why they are inferior? Spiral5800 (talk) 04:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The only advantage of DLP and PDP is their inherent ability to display frame sequential, unlike LCD which require special engineering. And checkerboard is indeed the best "half resolution" sampling method. I've cut down all the advertising to only feature the technical details. --83.167.100.36 (talk) 08:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
SO I suppose the dispute is over. I am removeing the note, then --Pot (talk) 09:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Move

This article should be moved to Active shutter 3D system. This article is not only about the glasses but also about the projection or the display and all other things regarding the whole system. In addition it is not necessary to use liquid crystal glasses for such a system, an example is the Teleview system. --Fluffystar (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I suggest Alternate-frame sequencing should be merged into this article. --uKER (talk) 05:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Support. It is quite evident. --134.109.240.113 (talk) 13:02, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Done. The article still needs revision. --Fluffystar (talk) 22:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I suggest DLP Link should be merged into this article. --134.109.240.113 (talk) 13:02, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Done. --Fluffystar (talk) 21:55, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

600Hz plasma display

There is no such thing. Either support that claim with some source or remove it. --Xerces8 (talk) 17:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Feel free to remove or correct it if you think it is wrong. --Fluffystar (talk) 11:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

History of shutter glasses

Some older history of 3d glasses here: epanorama.net. There is also a lot of stuff at 3dmagic.com, detailing among other things commerical shutter glasses products in the 90s.

Interesting sources. --Fluffystar (talk) 10:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Active shutter 3D system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Active_shutter_3D_system/Archive_1&oldid=1029542862"