Talk:Abu Yahya al-Libi

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge?

I dunno if Abu Yahia al-Libi and Hasan Qayad are the same individual, or, if they are which name should be the main name of the merged article. Geo Swan (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hasan Qayad seems like more of a "personal name" and the one the US Military seems to use, while Abu Yahia is a patronomyl name with his "al-Libi" designation ("The Libyan"), so I'd favour putting the merged article at Hasan Qayad. Cheers. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 02:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suppport merge - this needs to be done. AWT (talk) 13:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hassan Qaid (which is a better rendering than Qayad) is Abu Yahya's real name, according to his buddies in al-Qa'ida.

حسن قايد Hassan Qaid

His brother Abdul-Wahhab Qaid alias Abu Idris is also a bigshot in LIFG.

The articles should be merged, I'm sure. LDH (talk) 09:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section of capture in Pakistan on Sunday March 7, 2010

There are no reports that Abu Yahya al-Libi (note the al-libi) was captured in Karachi on Sunday March 7, 2010. The similarly named American (not Libyan) Abu Yahya Mujahdeen Al-Adam was reported by the New York Times in [1] to have been captured. In fact this name probably is Abu Yahya Mujahdeen Al-Azam. Assuming this is al-Libi is incorrect. The cite you provided from Dawn (mangled as it was) actually says he is an American and give that same full name too [2]. You need a cite that says it is Abu Yahya al-Libi (not any person named Abu Yahya). Kevin Purcell (talk) 00:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. I notice that this individual, like the American, is described as the producer of propaganda videos. I wonder how much confusion there has been over which Abu Yahya produced which videos.

If I am not mistaken "Abu Yahya" means "father of Yahya".

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 01:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

explanation

I reverted this edit, which had the edit summary: "Are you sure that's the right guy? His skin is a lot lighter."

As per WP:VER truth is not our concern -- verifiability is our concern. The image is referenced to this document. Go to page 26. An WP:RS says this is an image of Abu Yahya al-Libi. American intelligence officials have mis-identified some suspects. But we are not WP:RS. It is not our job to correct WP:RS based on our own personal judgment. Geo Swan (talk) 20:57, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? That document doesn't even show the picture. Also, truth and verifiability are the same thing. Check out these three links. They prove that the picture shown is not al-Libi.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=omar_al-faruq

http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2008/07/senior_al_qaeda_comm.php

http://www.defenddemocracy.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11785025&Itemid=361

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.204.44 (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hasan Qayad DOD 2.png Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Hasan Qayad DOD 2.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

al-Libi was / is the only black skinned leader of Al Qaeda, and has / had an egalitarian political view..

Al Libi was (assuming the june 4th 2012 drone killed him) a Libyan with black skinned ancestors, the only one from Africa to rise to Al Qaeda's top rank. His political outlook was that under Islam, all people (at least all men) are equal, and that feudalism and racial prejudgement is therefore at odds with Islam. Which made him a top ace in attracting people from disenfranchised communities, like black people in northern Africa, and low cast people in the highly feudal regions of Afghanistan and Pakistan. For that reason, (contrary to Bin Laden) he also favored Somalia's Al Shabaab, who are the only Somali militia who have significant numbers of Bantu-Africans in their ranks, and even in their leadership.

Al Qaeda faces as a political problem, that from their Saudi roots they have inherited this Salafist anti racial and anti feudal, leftist egalitarian outlook. Which works as a strong recruiting tool to underprivileged people, but which also lands them trouble with the conservative leaders of potential allies (often from high ranking feudal families) in anti government militia like Taliban, MNLA Tuaregs in Mali and the tribal militia's in Libya and Yemen.

The death of Al Libya (if true) might make Al Qaeda's relations with the Taliban easier, who planned to throw them out of Afghanistan as soon as US had fully withdrawn, precisely because under Al Libi, they uprooted the social system, recruiting over ethnic cleavages from low cast Taliban 'subjects'. (And because Al Qaeda tends to attract drones.)

Can this info be somehow useful to help give some political color to Al Libi? (I know, very little sources apart from weird stuff on extremist websites in Arabic, Somali and Pashtu)Pieter Felix Smit (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name confusion explained..

Abu Yahya al-Libi is basically the same name as (Abu) Yunis al Sahrawi, with Sahrawi being a more precise reference to where he came from: southern (black majority) Libya. These are self chosen names, while before adopting Saudi style Islam, likely his given name was Hassan Qayad al-Far. Often, Muslims, especially from north Africa, joining a Salafist fighting group, take up a new name, rejecting the often feudal Malikite system in which their previous name was given. Reason: the naming system in tribal North-African society ties you to a family and a (sub)clan, obliging you to hold tribal and family loyalty above everything else. Often , black people are given names not after their biological parents, but after the (former) owners of their parents. Rejecting this system is core business for Salafist Islam, more so for someone from southern Libya.Pieter Felix Smit (talk) 07:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The terminology on this article "Islamist terrorist" may be excluded as there is no such thing exists. A terrorist is terrorist, regardless of a religion. 39.41.225.15 (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done A horse is a horse, regardless of colour, but it does not follow that no such thing as a brown horse exists. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Abu Yahya al-Libi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abu Yahya al-Libi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140925062013/http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1267/AQList.htm to http://www.un.org/sc/committees/1267/AQList.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dia.mil/site6_images/cards/AF-PK.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 37 external links on Abu Yahya al-Libi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

Given his nationality the use of MM/DD/YYYY contravenes Wikipedia's guidelines. Would someone change them to the appropriate DD/MM/YYYY? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:8E90:AE01:39A1:FE5D:627D:C8B9 (talk) 12:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]