The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
Aaron Rodgers was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Aaron Rodgers Day was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 May 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Aaron Rodgers. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
2 of the 3 cited sources do not work and or have been taken down and the 3rd (ny times article) does not mention his SAT score. it doesn't appear the claim can be substantiated by any sources. I suggest removing the claim of his 1310 SAT score. 2605:A601:A692:E200:CC87:CCFF:FE67:8029 (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, it's an essay that's linked from MOS:FURTHER. It exists to be as an extended explanation of the MOS guideline, and that's exactly how I've used it here. Usefully, we can always let other editors fill out a further reading section over time per WP:NOTFINISHED, although that's a proper essay.
Also, your mention of 512 citations did give me the thought that this article would actually benefit from a further reading section. MOS:FURTHER calls out the potential for using a further reading section for cited and uncited references when "the References section is too long for a reader to use as part of a general reading list". Ed[talk][OMT]01:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To me, this piece isn't the most helpful source for the article, but is nevertheless an in-depth portrayal and deeply reported profile of the subject, some of his impact, and where he came from. Hence the further reading proposal for a link that meets the topical, reliable, and balanced criteria at WP:FURTHERREADING, and meets the "publications that were not used by editors to build the current article content, but which editors still recommend" standard. Ed[talk][OMT]06:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My primary concern is that creating a new section with just one citation lends itself to undue weight on that article. If you want to go through and pull out like 5 good overview articles and create a Further reading section, I would have no qualms with that. However, I think there could also be a strong argument that Aaron Rodgers is very well-covered, if not too much (325k bytes right now) and that since this topic is a biography, there really isn't too much "further reading" on the subject. If anything, all it will do is regurgitate mostly what is already written in his article. « Gonzo fan2007(talk) @ 14:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Undue weight refers to "fairly represent[ing] all significant viewpoints" about an article subject within the article. Emphasis on viewpoints. I am struggling to see how it applies in this case unless there's a specific minority viewpoint that you believe the Athletic article is espousing about Rodgers, but that's not an opinion piece, just a deeply reported profile. I also don't see how that duplicates the article. There are other potential further reading options out there, such as this New Yorker piece from a few days ago, this Milwaukee Magazine profile from early in his career, or this Mina Kimes profile from 2017 (which is used in one citation about Rodger's religion but is a much wider piece). Ed[talk][OMT]06:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect New york bozo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 15 § New york bozo until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:52, 15 December 2024 (UTC)