Talk:ABC Music

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal ABC Music is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music

Record Labels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

(Old comment from merged page ABC Classics)

Assessment completed
As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: requires references and other ways for reader to verify content . However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS ^talk 12:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Old comment from merged page ABC Classics)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://fourfourmusic.com/about/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MER-C 13:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from ABC Classics

I'm proposing this merge after doing quite a lot of work trying to rationalise and properly document the various components of the ABC, which have changed over time. With no dedicated page or website of its own, and as far as I can see only listed as a genre on the ABC Music website now, I cannot see a case for keeping a separate article which gets very few page views (under 10 throughout the past 90 days). Also, it seems to have changed its name from ABC Classics ([1], [2]) to ABC Classic ([3], [4]). The only separate imprint linked to from the ABC Music website now is Four Four, so perhaps there's a slightly stronger case for keeping that one... but the page views are even lower there, so I wouldn't be averse to just including that in a section in this article too. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the proposed merge and think that Four Four should go also be merged in as an imprint. The redirect from ABC Classics will allow people to find the section if they don't think of it as an imprint. If the section on ABC Classic gets too much information in it then it can be split up but I don't think it likely in the near future. Gusfriend (talk) 06:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Gusfriend. I have just merged ABC Classics. I'll come back to Four Four later. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]