Talk:5-4-3-2-Run

This page was proposed for deletion by JoeNMLC (talk · contribs) on 21 October 2024.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 5-4-3-2-Run article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Game shows Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television game shows task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Television Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Notability

I clipped out three articles which contain some detail about the show. The first one I think is the best, but I think the three combined are enough to pass WP:NTV now. What do you think, @JoeNMLC:, @Sammi Brie:, @Bcschneider53:? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added some articles that aren't primarily about the show but do add some factual heft. I think there's just barely enough here. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:51, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With the caveat that I do tend to err on the side of an inclusionist (and the belief that stubs are better than nothing), I think there's enough here to warrant the article's existence. It can obviously use some additional references on its reception and production if they're out there, but I don't think it should be in danger of being deleted either, especially after the recent additions. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 22:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have also just discovered that I of all people assessed this as WP:STARTCLASS back in 2014...that may have been a bit optimistic on my part, but that was the month where I assessed all of the unassessed Game Show WikiProject articles, so it's definitely possible a couple weren't 100% accurate. Probably worth leaving it as "Start" at this point though given its recent expansion to +6,000 bytes. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 22:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]