Jump to content

Talk:330 West 42nd Street/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

[edit]
  • Infobox and lead look good.
  • "the The Orion" → "The Orion"
  • "walls of central entrance" - is a "the" missing?
  • "Art Deco style" → "Art Deco-style"
  • "approved a move" → "approved a motion"
  • "which led" → "that led"
  • "Steel work" should be one word.
  • "less than $15 million, less than" - repetitive?
  • "ten percent the $175 million" → "ten percent of the $175 million"
  • "through the building" → "throughout the building"
  • Check for citation ordering issues.
  • Wall Street JournalThe Wall Street Journal
  • Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from The Real Deal New York with "|url-access=subscription".
  • Wikilink Paul Goldberger, Christopher Gray, Grace Glueck, David W. Dunlap, Jon Pareles, Ada Louise Huxtable, and Lewis Mumford.

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks. I've done all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Passing the article but there are still a few ordering issues. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.