Talk:2025/Archive 1

Archive 1

Predicted year for the start of widespread use of the IPv6 Internet Protocol."

Can someone please explain this one to me? Captain Jackson 06:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Unsourced and not credible. Deleting this patent nonsense. Moving other nonsense to fiction. CP/M ^comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 16:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

India's Gas

is it gas or gas? or something else? BillPP 23:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Russians and the Moon

What about the Russians wanting to land a man on the moon by 2025? - .:. Jigsy .:. 22:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Russian economy

Russia may become the largest consumer market in Europe and the 4th largest in the world by 2025, according to the latest data from the market research firm, Nielsen.

Can someone add this link as the reference? http://www.russiatoday.ru/business/news/16471/video

-G —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.158.83 (talk) 03:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Inauguration

The inauguration is this year, but also the first year that MLK day will be on the same day as the inauguration, which is a federal holiday. What has higher priority?? 96.248.98.212 (talk) 23:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Actually, according to the Wikipedia page concerning the United States presidential inauguration, if January 20 falls on a Sunday of an inauguration year, then the public inauguration takes place on the following Monday (a private inauguration having taken place on the proper day). So this will be a problem only two years from now, when January 20, 2013 falls on a Sunday and thus the address would be made on January 21, which is MLK Jr. Day.

However, this is not a problem that has not been faced before. Bill Clinton's second inauguration, in 1997, also happened to fall on MLK Jr. Day. They did not reschedule the inauguration, so to answer your question, the presidential inauguration has a higher priority. SheaF91 (talk) 07:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2025. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060908024816/http://palgn.com.au/article.php?id=4580 to http://palgn.com.au/article.php?id=4580

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Eclipses

See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page. Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Paramount Pictures Corporation distributed 20th Century Studios films

After the success of ‘’Beauty and the Beast’’ and ‘’The Lion King’’, Paramount Pictures Corporation will later be distributed 20th Century Studios films that, young children got one last choice to see new films produced by 20th Century Studios in 2025, both live-action and computer-animation to later be distributed by Paramount Pictures Corporation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.18.244 (talk) 15:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

The keys of St. Peter open the door again in 2025.

There will be a Holy Jubilee of the global Catholic Church throughout the year of 2025, with plenary forgiving of sins for the faithful and the Shroud of Turin is scheduled to go on public display again. This is a notable future event for 1.2+ billion people: https://www.giubileo-2025.it/en 158.88.16.4 (talk) 11:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Date format

I would like to suggest changing the date format of this article to the DMY format (e.g. 6 June 2020 as opposed to June 6, 2020). The DMY format seems more international and more suitable for a "global" article like. Also DMY simply makes more sense as it goes from smallest to highest.

At the village pump, I've presented a proposal to establish a standard to use DMY in general for all articles about "generic" years. The discussion got kind of messy however, and I'll propaly restart it at some point. In the meantime, I would like it to create consensus about changing 2025 specifically as well as all other nine articles about the 2020s to the DMY format.--Marginataen (talk) 08:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

I'm pasting the same reply at all the 2020s talk page sections on this topic, with the exception of 2023. As of about a month ago, we had a situation in which all generic year articles had a consistent date format. Since both date styles are considered appropriate per the Manual of Style, it's unusual to see such solid consistency. Since I value consistency, I appreciated that rare situation.

As of last month, only 2023 was changed via local consensus to be different than the rest. If this proposal passes for this article, it would join a tiny minority of articles that do not match the overall consistent style. I oppose for that reason.

I would be fine with all generic year articles changing to consistently use a different style, and that is the proposal on the table at WP:VPR#Date format for year articles. Currently, it seems we're at the tail end of a pre-RfC discussion with plans to move forward with an RfC in the next week or so. I would much prefer to keep discussing the overarching change rather than have individual discussions at each year article. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:07, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Remove Parole Eligibility for Yolanda Saldivar?

Compared to everything else already in the article (eg: elections, leadership tenure ending, multinational sporting events, etc), the parole eligibility point for it doesn't seem to be important enough for inclusion. I think it's better suited for a different place, like a music article or elsewhere. Just a suggestion. Losipov (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

It is not notable at all and should not be here. We don't cover the release of notable inmates like OJ Simpson in 2017 or Bill Cosby in 2021 and these were releases. In OJs case he served his time while Cosby's sentence was vacated. In this case we are talking about parole, which is supervised release while still serving your sentence and this is just where she is merely eligible for parole. There is zero notability here whatsoever and is better featured in an article about this year in music. PaulRKil (talk) 20:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)