Talk:2024 Labour Party freebies controversy

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 19 September 2024 by reviewer Wikishovel (talk · contribs).

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 27 September 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to United Kingdom freebies controversy. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Name change?

I believe this article should have its name changed. It's not just a Keir Starmer controversy, it's a government controversy. 82.14.16.140 (talk) 21:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To "Freebies row" or "Freebies scandal" perhaps, per WP:COMMONNAME? -- DeFacto (talk). 21:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. NHCLS (talk) 10:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree with this now there is now reports saying that former Tory Prime Minister David Cameron along with his wife Samantha Cameron accepted freebie clothes paid for with Tory donor cash I do believe as a result this is becoming a controversy outside of the Labour Party as well. Pikachu3408 (talk) 15:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 September 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans 16:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Labour Party freebies controversy → United Kingdom freebies controversy – Former Tory chancellor George Osborne had suggested on the podcast that former Tory Prime Minister David Cameron and his wife Samantha Cameron had received freebie clothes paid for with Tory donor cash to "look smart" which was undeclared at the time. Therefore I do believe that the current controversy is now becoming a wider controversy across the political spectrum. Pikachu3408 (talk) 16:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as that, which presumably happened more than ten years ago, is unrelated to the current row. If it was notable and controversial at the time, then perhaps consider creating a new article for it instead of trying to roll it into this one. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because the current scandal is in and of itself notable and deserving of its own article. The current scandal is happening now and involves the Labour Party. I'm not sure if a separate article (or perhaps a disambig page) involving other similar scandals in the UK is needed, but in any event, this article should remain, and with "2024" and "Labour" in its title. Personally, I'd prefer "scandal" rather than "controversy" in the title, but that's not the topic of this particular RM. -2003:CA:870C:78EA:2A7B:3D46:AD1C:A193 (talk) 23:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.