Jump to content

Talk:2022 Fiesta Bowl (December)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2022 Fiesta Bowl (December)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 02:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 20:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

I think the game summary is too heavy and excessive and could probably come down in size quite a bit. Only minor changes are needed elsewhere. Ping me when addressed. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 20:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Teams

[edit]

Game summary

[edit]

Sourcing and spot checks

[edit]

Reviewed: 4, 9, 10, 18, 20

No issues.

Images

[edit]

Are there any relevant images available?