Talk:2016–17 College Football Playoff/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 06:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 20:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Stable?
[edit]Yes Cos (X + Z) 20:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio?
[edit]Earwig shows a 7.4% due to the name and the quotes. Cos (X + Z) 20:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]- sources are styled well.
- all sources are reliable except for [17] which is a blog.
doing a spot check of all the sources in 3 rounds.This passes.
- Round 1
- [19].
- [23].
- [14].
- [30]. 1st mention. 2nd mention.
- [22].
- [5]. 1st mention. 2nd mention.
- [6].
- Round 2
- [8].
- [16].
- [25].
- [31].
Prose
[edit]- and the pick-six was their eleventh defensive touchdown of the season. Who is the "pick-six"?
- "Pick-six" is just means "interception returned for a touchdown" - I switched up the wording to clarify this. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Promoting. Cos (X + Z) 17:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.