Talk:2014 Wales summit

This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles

International relations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales High‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name of article

The image of the official logo used suggests, rather srongly, that the event would be more properly described as the "2014 Wales Summit"? Martinevans123 (talk) 12:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, both NATO itself [1] and the UK government [2] are calling this the "Wales Summit", not the "Newport Summit". We should change the name of the article to reflect the official name. --Tocino 06:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Except that no other NATO summit article titles give the name of the country - they all give the name of the city. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So it seems we've been conistently wrong or NATO have changed their naming policy? Martinevans123 (talk)

It may well not be a change in "policy", so much as someone in the Pentagon saying "where the &^*! is Newport ?" But I agree that, for an international audience, we should use the official title. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:49, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

outcome section

It would be nice to have a little filler below each bulleted topic explaining briefly their entailment. -OR- each bullet should lead to an article explaining fully the alliance's position Thanx~ Doyna Yar (talk) 04:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]