Talk:2014–15 College Football Playoff/GA1

GA Review

Passed.
Well done PCN02WPS. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 22:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 20:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 20:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Stable?

Yes Cos ^{(X + Z)} 20:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?

Earwig shows a 14.5% due to the names of the teams. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 20:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources(2)

sources are styled well.
all sources are reliable.
~~doing a spot check of all the sources in 4 rounds.~~ Spot check is a pass

Round 1

[25]. 1st mention.Y 2nd mention.N 3rd mention. leaning Y

Removed second mention. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[20].Y
[28].? Can't access
[7].Y
[1].Y
[30]. 1st mention.? 2nd mention.Y

Round 2

[22].Y
[13]. 1st mention.Y 2nd mention.Y
[5].Y
[9].Y
[33].Y
[12]. 1st mention.Y 2nd mention.Y
[31].N I don't see where is the fact in this source that the game ended with an interception.

Fixed. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[3].Y
[14]. 1st mention.Y 2nd mention.Y
[16].Y

Round 3

[2].Y
[4].Y
[6].Y
[8].Y
[10].Y
[11].Y
[15].Y
[17].Y
[18].Y
[19].Y

Prose

Later that week, No. 3 Auburn defeated No. 4 Ole Miss, 35–31, in what the Associated Press called "the first College Football Playoff knockout game". does the period need to be outside the quote?
- Yes, see MOS:LQ. Full stop goes outside the quotes in this instance because only a sentence fragment is being quoted. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The 101st Rose Bowl, it was the first in which a team scored more than 50 points, and it marked the end of the Seminoles' 29-game unbeaten streak. --> The 101st Rose Bowl was the first Rose Bowl in which a team scored more than 50 points. The game marked the end of the Seminoles' 29-game winning streak.
- Changed instead to The game was the 101st edition of the Rose Bowl and the first in which a team scored more than 50 points. It also marked the end of the Seminoles' 29-game unbeaten streak. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Like Cos ^{(X + Z)} 02:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CosXZ Just wanted to check up on this and the reviews for the 2015–16 and 2016–17 playoff articles. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PCN02WPS, Promoting this article. Will continue with the rest of the reviews. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 22:08, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.