Talk:2011 royal tour of Canada

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2011 royal tour of Canada article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

2011 royal tour of Canada was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 8, 2011	Articles for deletion	No consensus
July 30, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
January 9, 2013	Good article nominee	Not listed
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 13, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 2011 royal tour of Canada* featured the first Canadian citizenship ceremony to include a member of Canada's royal family?*
Current status: Former good article nominee

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Commonwealth

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Commonwealth, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Commonwealth of Nations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CommonwealthWikipedia:WikiProject CommonwealthTemplate:WikiProject CommonwealthCommonwealth articles

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Royal standards of Canada#The Duke of Cambridge's standard|the Duke of Cambridge's royal standard for Canada]] The anchor (#The Duke of Cambridge's standard) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Protests

Shouldn't the protests against the visit in Montreal and Quebec City be mentioned? Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 18:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most certainly, and they are mentioned in the article, chronologically, whenever they occurred. A summary of the protests is in the Reception section. -- Zanimum (talk) 16:26, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That must be why Quebecers overwhelmingly voted in favor of the federalist New Democratic Party in the recent General Election, instrumental in elevating the party, for the first time in Canadian history, to the position of L'Opposition Loyale de Sa Majesté, and its leader to reside in Stornoway.

"Dooch" vs "Douche"

The July 4 blooper involving a singer in PEI getting tongue tied before her performance is getting some media play internationally. If this article survives AFD and is expanded, it should be noted that while British media and the US Huffington Post are reporting that the singer accidentally used the word "Douche" when referring to the Duke and Duchess before her performance, what she actually said, and which has been reported by the Canadian Press wire service and CBC, is "Dooch", and this is the version that should be used in the article (with acknowledgment of the misunderstanding), if this incident is considered notable enough. 68.146.71.145 (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to do a little more research

They're not British royalty. They're Canadian royalty.

This article has significance because this illustrious visit to the Realm is seen as a snub to the United States--it is a reminder to the United States that it is "only" in North America. It is poetic justice finally hearing Americans wanting to be referred to as "North Americans". God Save the Queen...of Canada. I guess Americans would really start to feel snubbed if the the Duke and Duchess decide to spend time regularly in their Realm. They're only visiting Los Angeles because many of their loyal subjects do well there.

Please sign your comments. And you might want to do a little research yourself; they're going to Los Angeles on a trade mission to promote British industry. Exactly how any snub could be seen by the US is puzzling, since Canada is a Commonwealth country, and as correctly noted, the Canadian monarchy is separate from the British monarchy, technically. So for them to have gone anywhere else would have been considered a huge snub for Canada. Not the US. 68.146.71.145 (talk) 03:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I don't even see where they were referred to as British royalty in the article. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Number of dresses

The estimate regarding the number of dresses Catherine was expected to wear needs to be revised down, since one notable, and much-reported aspect, of the tour is the fact she's worn the same outfit several times. Unless you want to play around with "mix and match" combinations being different outfits, I don't think she's worn more than maybe 15 outfits, give or take a few. 68.146.71.145 (talk) 03:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hoping Macleans or someone will have a tour fashion in review, as they started in this week's issue. Thing is, the original prediction should be left it: expectations are as important as eventual reality. It shows the media expected her to be a clothes hoar--apologies on the crude term, but it's relatively common--and instead she rewore things, she kept the same outfit for multiple events, etcetera, etcetera, preferring to spend her time with the people, as opposed to in the closets. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stampede protests?

Were there any protests at the parade, by PETA, as promised? Did street preacher Art Pawlowski march after the parade? -- Zanimum (talk) 02:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 royal tour of Canada/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Edge3 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! My review will come shortly. Edge3 (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article was peer reviewed on July 15, 2011. (See review.) Many of the suggestions provided by Ruhrfisch still apply today. The lead section should be expanded, and several statements remain unsourced. Before this article can be promoted to GA status, editors should attempt to resolve all of the issues that Ruhrfisch identified.

I have only a few extra suggestions of my own. The article currently has several images that are giving it a "cluttered" appearance. According to WP:IMAGELOCATION, you should "avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other". Please limit the images in the article to only those that are most relevant, and keep the images within the appropriate sections. Please read WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE for further information.

Because there is still a lot of work to be done, I am failing this GA nomination. Edge3 (talk) 20:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011 royal tour of Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707143647/http://www.680news.com/news/national/article/248818--duke-and-duchess-of-cambridge-will-unveil-the-canadians-opposite-lens-the-latest-canadian-war-museum-acquisition to http://www.680news.com/news/national/article/248818--duke-and-duchess-of-cambridge-will-unveil-the-canadians-opposite-lens-the-latest-canadian-war-museum-acquisition

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Duchess of Cambridge in Canada 2011.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]