Talk:2010 United Nations Security Council election

A news item involving 2010 United Nations Security Council election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 1 January 2011.

Wikipedia

International relations: United Nations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Hungary in 12-13

Hungary will go for the 2012-13 Eastern European seat in the 2011 elections, [1].--Mátyás (talk) 19:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Canada in (when?)

Canada has dropped out after coming third behind Portugal, which is now expected to get the second WEOG seat. Germany easily won the first WEOG seat. Saw this on CTV News website. GBC (talk) 17:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan

Taiwan is shaded blue, the same color as China. Taiwan enjoys no representation in the Security Council. Ban Ki-moon's recent statement does not constitute a unilateral annexation of Taiwan to China, nor does the IMF designation "Taiwan, Province of China" imbue Taiwan with PRC SAR or provincial status, nor should any such statement that "Taiwan is a part of China" be taken to mean that the democratic government of Taiwan is represented by the autocratic Politburo of the PRC in the Security Council, because it is -- de facto -- not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.83.202.10 (talk) 09:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This map represents the official view of the United Nations, which is that Taiwan belongs to the People's Republic of China. I don't like it either, I would prefer an independent Taiwan, but the UN has a different opinion, and as encyclopaedists we should abide by the fact that they do, as this article is about election to a UN organ.--Mátyás (talk) 18:16, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United Nations Security Council election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100816151545/http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de:80/diplo/en/Aussenpolitik/InternatOrgane/VereinteNationen/Aktuelles/d-sicherheitsrat-2011-12.html to http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/diplo/en/Aussenpolitik/InternatOrgane/VereinteNationen/Aktuelles/d-sicherheitsrat-2011-12.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]