Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
On my system the references terminate after the yahoo mail regarding North Korea. Does anybody know, what problem we have here?
is resolved FHessel (talk) 10:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since we are approaching 2010, there will be calls to rename the table 2009-2010 flu pandemic or something similar along these lines. Anyone care to comment on a name change? Also the loading times for editing a table of this size is taking longer. Its more probably more to do with the extra information, and countries being added. The bulk of the table has been taken up by the Indicators column which has separate colour codings for each country. FHessel did a great job adding them in the middle of the year and I would like to have his comments whether we should relocate the Indicators and put them into another table. At least this will halve the loading times for editing the table. Another thing is that we are getting some many numbers being bandied around that we might have missed differentiating A/H1N1 flu from other types of influenza. This was the case a month or so back with Ukraine, and I have a feeling that the Japan numbers with a few numbers are not so accurate. But since the situation is so fluid, with the increasing number of cases and deaths we tend to ignore this. Roman888 (talk) 15:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Name change: Sure, 2009-2010 flu pandemic seems adequate.
Indicators column: regarding the indicators I am ambivalent. On the one hand I still regard them as being important. On the other hand it is imperative to updated them, and there seems to be nobody except me, who would do this job. But - I do not have the time for updating them. So, do whatever you think is appropriate.
It would certainly shorten it, but I don't see any value in doing so. The numbers are already hidden by default, so the gain to the end user would be minimal. Additionally, there are surely many people interested in said #s and they are part of the total at the top. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
