Jump to content

Talk:2007 Malta Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I need help

[edit]

hi there

i took a template for this article from 2006 football (soccer) world cup - s article my problem with this one is that it has a game "scheduled" for the 3rd place in snooker though, they don't do that. can someone pls tell me how can I modify this template to lose the game for 3rd place?

(i'll keep on searching, maybe i find something)

thanks

[The previous unsigned comment was added by Csabadapp (talk · contribs), 05:09, February 7, 2007]

Shouldn't be hard, but do the tied-for-third finishers actually get no prize money and no recognition? — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 01:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
PS: While you can rip the Polish version of the article's code to get rid of that box, what is the harm in retaining it? — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 05:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need flags

[edit]

Unless ALL of these people are British, these entries all need {{flag|GBR}}, etc.:  GBR

For after the first occurrence (column 2, etc.) use {{flagicon|GBR}}: United Kingdom

Or even more specific than GBR, if they are identified as English, Scottish, Welsh, N.Irish, etc., as well French and so forth for non-British competitors.

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Flag Template for details.

SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 01:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: See left menu for Polish version. Kind of embarassing that theirs is better than ours! Heh. Aside from the flags, the the fact that it has an intro is rather vital. Most people would perpetually classify this as a stub if it has no introductory text explaining what it is at all (remember the "Random page" feature...) — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 05:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2007 Malta Cup/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 08:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

[edit]
[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]

Tournament Summary

[edit]
Round 1
[edit]
Round 2
[edit]
Quarter-finals
[edit]
  • "improved his performance" - kind of goes against MOS. Should probably say he won the final four frames, unless there's a quote to say he played better. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:04, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Carter entered his first semi-final since the 1999 Grand Prix and Hendry revealed a bout of gastroenteritis from consuming a chicken and prawn meal the night before for which he was given injections affected his on-table play - restructure sentence. The important bit is regarding the food poisoning for Hendry, I'd say:

Hendry revealed that a bout of gastroenteritis from consuming a chicken and prawn meal the night before for which he was given injections had affected his on-table play, whilst Carter entered his first semi-final since the 1999 Grand Prix. Or, this could easily be two sentences. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:04, 7 May 2019 (UTC)#[reply]

Semi-finals
[edit]
Final
[edit]

Notes & References

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Comments
  • Hi! This one might take me a little time, as I'm not really in the super free time at the moment, but I'll get to it. Looks a great article as usual. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm just going to pass this one now. Looking above, there's very little comments, and nothing to stop it being a GA. I'd still suggest changing the above to improve the article, but I won't keep it open for no reason. Well done! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:11, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]