Talk:1984 Manal Aru massacres

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1984 Manal Aru massacres article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Sri Lanka, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Military history: Asian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Sri Lanka Low‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Use of Primary Sources

@Oz346, can you please explain why you have added further details citing what appears to be a primary source. Kalanishashika (talk) 13:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTHR is a well established reliable source and it is permitted to be used by the Sri Lanka reconciliation project. Oz346 (talk) 13:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Oz346, excuse me why did you revert my changes as "Reverting vandalism". As I understand, consensus needs to be reached to add content. Hence, I am removing your the content you added, until such time we can reach a consensus. Kalanishashika (talk) 13:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTHR has been established as a reliable source, true. However, in the article you cited from it is a Primary Source. Kalanishashika (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no rule saying primary source information can not be cited, it has been reviewed and analysed by a reliable secondary source UTHR. Oz346 (talk) 13:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

are you going to remove similar UTHR cited information from this page that incriminates the LTTE for example? of course not:

Eravur massacre#Incident Oz346 (talk) 13:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Oz346, what do you mean That is irrelevant when you readded the content. The cited report appears to be a primary source. Wikipedia:No original research states that primary sources should be used with care. You are adding content as if its fact based on the cited source. And yes, I think this would apply to any article. Kalanishashika (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]