Jump to content

Talk:1967 European Cup final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1967 European Cup final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 7, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Comment

[edit]

"who took the ball first time and shot home from 25 yards"?

Looks the ball is just over the edge of the 18 yard box! There's always a tendency to inflate distances shots are hit from.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1967 European Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 16:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • I think this could be expanded a bit more. It should act as a summary for the entire article and make the reader want to read more. While you have included the important points, there is nothing about post-match.
  • "The match finished 2–1 to Celtic.", meaning? Was this there first European Cup? How many finals have they contested previously. Likewise with Inter.
Done. Adam4267 (talk) 11:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The match was said to be a victory for football...", unless you have a quote which says that to reference, I'll advise you to rephrase it.
Route to the final
  • There should be a semi colon between Milan Stanić and 'this'.
done Adam4267 (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The tie looked like it was going to end in a draw" → "The tie appeared to end in a draw"
Re-phrase this so it makes more sense. The tie appeared to end in a draw because of the late goal. Adam4267 (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Under Inter, "A Sandro Mazzola brace..." → "Two goals from Sandro Mazzola"
Done Adam4267 (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Match
  • "All the pre-match talk was about Internazionale...", really? "As they were considered such strong favourites going into the game" does not warrant a separate sentence, merge it with the one before. Done Adam4267 (talk) 19:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Internazionale were...Internazionale was", be consistant with using the plural or singular. As far as I'm aware, football clubs are singular but if you are talking about a team from a specific season, it's fine to use 'were'.
  • "Celtic were an incredibly attacking team", needs a bit more expansion. Incredibly attacking suggest to a great degree, you could say "By contrast, Celtic was an attacking team..." tried to tidy this up a bit. What do you think?
  • "his last match of the season was on 24 December", 24 December 1995? 1481? I know this links with a season article (1966–67 European Cup) but a year needs to be added for the ordinary reader. Done Adam4267 (talk) 19:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Summary
  • Try to avoid 'journo' writing where appropriate, for instance: "relentlessly attacking".
  • "whose header hit Ronnie Simpson's knees", put Celtic goalkeeper between 'hit' and 'Ronnie'.
  • "Internazionale then won a penalty less than a minute later." → "Moments after Internazionale had won a penalty"
  • "ultra-defensive" defensive is fine on it's own.
  • "and Celtic were allowed freedom to attack" → "thus giving Celtic the impetus to attack"
Done all. Adam4267 (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Details
  • Remove spacing from scoreline.
Done. Adam4267 (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Post match
  • 'Celtic's triumph of attacking play over Internazionale's cattenacio was heralded as a win for football.', needs citing.
I personally feel that the quotes after it give off that impression, Herrera says "the match was a victort for sport". But if you feel differently then I will change it. I have also made some more additions to the article, what do you think about them as well as the order of paragraphs in the Background and Post-match sections? Adam4267 (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done but the opposite way because Shankly spoke to him immediately after the match. Adam4267 (talk) 19:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1967 European Cup Final. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1967 European Cup Final. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1956 European Cup Final which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]