Talk:¡Tré!

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 September 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Day (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Day, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green DayWikipedia:WikiProject Green DayTemplate:WikiProject Green DayGreen Day articles

Punk music (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles

Proposal for Deletion

I find it unnecessary for ¡Tré! to have a page if ¡Dos! doesn't have one yet. Either make one for ¡Dos! or delete this one please. --173.218.215.70 (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, especially since most of the text has been copied from ¡Uno!'s article. Alec scheat (talk) 10:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An article for ¡Dos! should be created and this should be deleted. Similarly to how ¡Uno! was the only one with an article for months. If all of them exist at one time, much of the three articles will be the same. ¡Dos!'s article should be created and ¡Tré! should wait after the release of ¡Dos!. -- Lar409 17:34, September 26 2012 —Preceding undated comment added 21:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i created Dos since Uno is out. We should wait until Dos comes out to do the same with Tre and especially since this is a direct copy. Either edit it and add the cover and some small details and have it a stub article of some sort or just completely wait until Dos comes out and do the same thing as Dos. BlackDragon 02:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why not just merge all three articles into one when they have all come out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.220.223 (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Like the Use Your Illusion albums, these are seperate albums, so they should have seperate articles. Alec scheat (talk) 02:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tracklisting

Not only are the tracklisting on this album and Dos are unsourced, but there's no sources on songs' lengths. I suggest maybe changing the tracklistings to confirmed songs, until the band releases an official tracklisting. Alec scheat (talk) 02:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tracks and Potential Singles

http://greendayunodostrelyrics.blogspot.com/ there is a picture from a Green Day live show showing the tracks for all three albums. And it seems the ones with stars were to be singles though it seems that they replaced Carpe Diem for Oh Love. All four from uno that had it were singles and since stray heart was switched to dos it is still a single so it appears that the singles from Dos will be: Stray Heart, Fuck Time, Lady Cobra and Lazy Bones. and from Tre: 8th Ave Serenade and 99 Revolutions. it will probably have another since the switch to dos for stray heart. But it seems that this is what the singles were originally supposed to be for the trilogy. And uno had 1 song switch up so I thought I would share this. BlackDragon 19:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]