User contributions for North8000

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

19:3719:37, 24 October 2024 diff hist +268 Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Candidates/Robert McClenon →Questions for the candidate: What are your views on inclusionist and exclusionist type priorities/leanings? current
18:5618:56, 24 October 2024 diff hist −4 Wikipedia talk:Civility →Anti-religious bigotry: grammar current
18:5518:55, 24 October 2024 diff hist +887 Wikipedia talk:Civility →Anti-religious bigotry: +cmt
17:1017:10, 24 October 2024 diff hist +100 Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) →Your ideas (“notability”): Agree. My point was agreeing with the structure/content. If we want this to have legs, we'll need something with an even shorter with a good acronym for it.
17:0817:08, 24 October 2024 diff hist +167 Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) →Your ideas (“notability”): Agree. My point was agreeing with the structure/content.
15:3115:31, 24 October 2024 diff hist +292 Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) →Your ideas (“notability”): Yes. And the strongest consideration in it would be wp:notability per the notability guidelines, but the above other factors described above are also a part of that consideration.
15:2415:24, 24 October 2024 diff hist −5 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: Trying to find a source that says that the term is controversial is like trying to find a source that says rain is wet. Sources don't repeat glaringly obvious stuff.
15:2315:23, 24 October 2024 diff hist −2 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: fix indent
15:2215:22, 24 October 2024 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: fix indents
15:1815:18, 24 October 2024 diff hist +286 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: Trying to find a source that says that the term is controversial is like trying to find a source that says rain is wet. Sources don't repeat glaringly obvious stuff.
15:1515:15, 24 October 2024 diff hist +655 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: +cmt
02:0002:00, 24 October 2024 diff hist +640 Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) , The reality is that wp:notability is the operative word for "allowed to have a separate article" and the talisman for the fuzzy ecosystem/process which decides that. It incorporates more than just the wp:notability guidelines. If one tries to base it on summarizing just what the wp:notability guidelines say, IMO it won't work.
01:4701:47, 24 October 2024 diff hist +289 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: IMO the issues are a lot deeper and need a lot more fundamental fix than just picking an adjective. Starting with the fact that it is a term and otherwise not a distinct topic

20:2320:23, 23 October 2024 diff hist +8 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: tweak
20:2020:20, 23 October 2024 diff hist +5 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: tweak
20:1820:18, 23 October 2024 diff hist +15 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: tweak
20:1720:17, 23 October 2024 diff hist +35 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: tweak
20:1620:16, 23 October 2024 diff hist +103 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: tweak
20:1420:14, 23 October 2024 diff hist +85 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: tweak
20:1220:12, 23 October 2024 diff hist +763 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Break: +cmt
14:5014:50, 23 October 2024 diff hist +423 Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) →WP:NRIVALRY: Changing my support vote. On second thought/ as pointed out, "analysis" does add an additional requirement beyond GNG and I don't see that as a good thing. But to reinforce, GNG means coverage of the rivalry, not just synthesizing a topic / article validated by mentions of a rivalry.

20:2920:29, 22 October 2024 diff hist +56 Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) →WP:NRIVALRY: Looks good. Clarifies/reinforces what GNG means (coverage ''OF the topic of the article'', not just coverage that is somehow related to the topic) in an area where that is needed.
20:1920:19, 22 October 2024 diff hist +248 Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) →WP:NRIVALRY: Support Looks good. Clarifies/reinforces what GNG means (coverage ''of the topic of the article'') in an area where that is needed.
20:1220:12, 22 October 2024 diff hist +137 Wikipedia talk:Notability →Straw poll on our jargon: Yes, that's better.
18:2718:27, 22 October 2024 diff hist +237 Wikipedia talk:Notability →Straw poll on our jargon: Well, I'll conflict with myself and give a phrase for what it really is....the WP: Separate Article Criteria.
18:2118:21, 22 October 2024 diff hist +646 Wikipedia talk:Notability →Straw poll on our jargon: I don't think that even a phrase would be enough. Despite ostensibly being only about the core guidelines / GNG, the operative meaning is that it is a term for a crowd decision which is often based primarily on degree of GNG compliance, sometimes based primarily on degree of enclyclopedicness (per a few SNG's), also influenced by degree of compliance with wp:not (which is a measure of enclyclopecicness), and slightly influenced by real-world notability.
17:0417:04, 22 October 2024 diff hist +180 Wikipedia talk:Notability →Straw poll on our jargon: +response Impossible to find a better word to describe what wp:notability is.