User contributions for Doady

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

22:0022:00, 16 September 2020 diff hist +158 Talk:Criticism of Netflix →Cuties
21:5621:56, 16 September 2020 diff hist +1,155 Criticism of Netflix →Cuties: partial revert of Harizotoh9. Per included sources, Netflix agreed that the original marketing image they used was objectionable and claimed it was not representative. The source for this description is in the film. Also added additional statement from director.
21:3821:38, 16 September 2020 diff hist +7,249 Talk:Netflix →Cuties
18:3518:35, 16 September 2020 diff hist +1,495 User talk:Doady →Cuties and Netflix

21:4721:47, 14 September 2020 diff hist +493 Criticism of Netflix →Cuties: partial revert of ViperSnake151. Statement is a summary description of the film's content, just as a contributor might summarize a news article. The source is the film itself. The content of the film is the entire reason for the controversy. Tag: Reverted
09:3909:39, 14 September 2020 diff hist +1,443 User talk:Doady →September 2020
09:1609:16, 14 September 2020 diff hist +716 Netflix →Cuties
09:1209:12, 14 September 2020 diff hist +493 Netflix →Cuties: Added description of film content from scene that was source of original promotional image. The film itself is the source of this description. Not including a direct reference/link to any clip because a video of 11-year-old children doing these things would further promote sexualization of children. Clips are widely available online if any editor feels it necessary to check the accuracy of the description.
08:4908:49, 14 September 2020 diff hist +26 Netflix →Cuties: Removing designation of "Republican"; referenced members of Congress are bipartisan.
08:3108:31, 14 September 2020 diff hist −3 m User talk:Doady →Cuties and Netflix
08:2208:22, 14 September 2020 diff hist +120 Netflix →Cuties: Correcting Netflix recommended age, adding source
08:1608:16, 14 September 2020 diff hist +1 m Netflix →Cuties: Adding paragraphing for clarity
08:0508:05, 14 September 2020 diff hist +2,508 User talk:Doady →Cuties and Netflix
03:3203:32, 14 September 2020 diff hist +424 Criticism of Netflix Undid revision 978297519 by Harizotoh9 (talk) Harizotoh9 the source is the film itself. There is no analysis here. Netflix stated that they were "deeply sorry for the inappropriate artwork that [they] used for Mignonnes/Cuties. It was not OK, nor was it representative of [the] film...." However, the still image is from an actual scene in the film. The content of the film itself is the entire reason for the controversy. Tag: Undo
02:2502:25, 14 September 2020 diff hist +4,737 Netflix Undid revision 978297353 by Harizotoh9 (talk)Harizotoh9 please do not make bulk edits. Please make edits individually with specific justification and not as a group. You were mistaken about the sources not being reliable per WP:RSP. Tag: Undo
00:3000:30, 14 September 2020 diff hist +424 Criticism of Netflix →Cuties: Netflix apologized for the still image on the original marketing poster stating it was "not OK" and that they were "deeply sorry". The still image comes from a minutes-long sequence in the film itself. If an image of something is "not OK", how is a video of the same "OK"? This disingenuousness by the distributor about the film's actual content is newsworthy. Does this require an actual clip from the film to source? Such clips are now widely available on the internet.
00:2800:28, 14 September 2020 diff hist +426 Cuties →Marketing: Netflix apologized for the still image on the original marketing poster stating it was "not OK" and that they were "deeply sorry". The still image comes from a minutes-long sequence in the film itself. If an image of something is "not OK", how is a video of the same "OK"? This disingenuousness by the distributor about the film's actual content is newsworthy. Does this require an actual clip from the film to source? Such clips are now widely available on the internet.
00:1500:15, 14 September 2020 diff hist +4,040 Netflix Undid revision 978269616 by HaeB (talk) Harizotoh9 incorrectly claimed that The Hill and Fox News are not reliable sources. In fact, they are both currently listed on WP:RSP as “Generally Reliable”. I retained the other sources as their reporting is consistent. Harizotoh9 made other edits unrelated to these sources that should be clearly and individually justified. Harizotoh9's edits appear to be based on personal opinion. Tag: Undo

23:5023:50, 13 September 2020 diff hist −4,040 Netflix Undid revision 978277785 by Doady (talk) Tag: Undo
23:4923:49, 13 September 2020 diff hist +4,040 Netflix Undid revision 978269616 by HaeB (talk) Tag: Undo
23:4923:49, 13 September 2020 diff hist −4,040 Netflix Undid revision 978277676 by Doady (talk) Tag: Undo
23:4823:48, 13 September 2020 diff hist +4,040 Netflix Undid revision 978269616 by HaeB (talk)Harizotoh9 had concretely named four sources you had used that are not seen as reliable (see also WP:RSP), do not reinstate before addressing these concerns Tag: Undo
21:3721:37, 13 September 2020 diff hist +4,695 Netflix Undid revision 978192790 by Harizotoh9 (talk) Blanket removal claiming multiple “issues” is clearly a POV edit. Please make separate changes with unique and singular edit summaries so issues, if any, can be resolved individually. Otherwise you just look like a Netflix employee trying to do damage control. Tag: Undo
12:3512:35, 13 September 2020 diff hist +268 Netflix →Cuties: Added another source re potential DOJ investigation; keeping "deprecated" sources for now as numerous "reliable" sources have not yet reported on this issue.
12:2012:20, 13 September 2020 diff hist +200 Netflix →Cuties: Corrected Netflix's current maturity rating of 'Cuties', including their recommended age of 18+. According to Netflix, TV-MA and R18 are essentially the same content-wise; one is used for television, the other for film.
11:4811:48, 13 September 2020 diff hist +1,414 Netflix →Cuties: Added additional sources regarding potential DOJ investigation of Netflix over possible child pornography violations Tag: use of deprecated (unreliable) source
11:2611:26, 13 September 2020 diff hist +159 Netflix →Cuties: Included further details regarding actual content of the film vs. Netflix’s misleading statements regarding the original promotional poster supposedly not being “representative”. Do we need a clip to source this, really? How about no.
11:1911:19, 13 September 2020 diff hist +427 Criticism of Netflix →Cuties: Clarifies that the image removed from marketing materials is still an entire scene in the film
11:1011:10, 13 September 2020 diff hist +1,611 Netflix Undid revision 978174726 by Harizotoh9 (talk) Reverting POV edits Tag: Undo
09:0809:08, 13 September 2020 diff hist +426 Cuties →Marketing: Additional details about Netflix's marketing statements vs the film's actual content
00:4000:40, 13 September 2020 diff hist +1,999 Netflix →Cuties: Updated with additional information, sources