User contributions for 188.61.251.156

4 January 2013

• 18:2618:26, 4 January 2013 diff hist +787 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →References clean-up: credible and current references/citations needed

3 January 2013

• 11:3611:36, 3 January 2013 diff hist +825 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →References clean-up: credible and current references/citations needed

1 January 2013

• 22:5422:54, 1 January 2013 diff hist +1,940 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon request for editing / cancellation of uneducated claim

4 November 2012

• 16:3216:32, 4 November 2012 diff hist +872 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: thank you!

30 October 2012

• 17:5017:50, 30 October 2012 diff hist +1,181 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: let's find CONSENSUS on correct referencing
• 05:5805:58, 30 October 2012 diff hist +1 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: minor fix
• 05:5705:57, 30 October 2012 diff hist +783 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: please follow WP:CONSENSUS, WP:OR, WP:SYN, WP:IDHT.

29 October 2012

• 19:3119:31, 29 October 2012 diff hist +1,060 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: why more refs? To argue?
• 18:2718:27, 29 October 2012 diff hist +1,492 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: if one cannot kill the message, kill the messenger: smart move!
• 08:5408:54, 29 October 2012 diff hist +4,018 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: new article section proposal
• 00:0400:04, 29 October 2012 diff hist +3,096 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: the first 3 references - more to follow

26 October 2012

• 10:3910:39, 26 October 2012 diff hist +2,512 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: long explanation - refs to follow

25 October 2012

• 19:1719:17, 25 October 2012 diff hist +61 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Metal swords, which had "rusted": state reference - original research???
• 19:1619:16, 25 October 2012 diff hist +183 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Chariots or wheeled vehicles: sounds a lot like original research...
• 19:1119:11, 25 October 2012 diff hist +635 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →References clean-up: I put some more reference needed marks into article
• 19:0319:03, 25 October 2012 diff hist +61 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Silk: check Wikipedia. How many other "silks" are there? Sea silk. Statement sounds like original research...
• 19:0019:00, 25 October 2012 diff hist +61 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Goats: no source - original research?
• 18:5818:58, 25 October 2012 diff hist +37 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Sheep: State source of argument - orginal research?
• 18:5618:56, 25 October 2012 diff hist +1 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: ref number correction
• 18:5518:55, 25 October 2012 diff hist +304 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: please follow WP:CONSENSUS, WP:OR, WP:SYN, WP:IDHT. Why don't you?
• 18:5018:50, 25 October 2012 diff hist +61 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Cement: follow Wikipedia rules: original research + personal oppinions do not belong into this article
• 18:4718:47, 25 October 2012 diff hist +1,248 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: please follow WP:CONSENSUS, WP:OR, WP:SYN, WP:IDHT. Why don't you?

23 October 2012

• 09:5609:56, 23 October 2012 diff hist +1,490 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: State your CURRENT + CREDIBLE reference. Why can't you?

21 October 2012

• 14:1914:19, 21 October 2012 diff hist +3,610 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: please state your CURRENT and CREDIBLE reference

20 October 2012

• 15:5315:53, 20 October 2012 diff hist +3,193 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: I still haven't seen one citation/references to your wrong claims...
• 14:3514:35, 20 October 2012 diff hist +896 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: please state your CURRENT and CREDIBLE reference
• 14:2014:20, 20 October 2012 diff hist +208 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →References clean-up: credible and current references/citations needed
• 14:1214:12, 20 October 2012 diff hist −12 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →References clean-up: better sentence
• 14:1114:11, 20 October 2012 diff hist +390 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →References clean-up: credible and current references/citations needed
• 14:0714:07, 20 October 2012 diff hist +122 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Iron and steel: reference needed - original research ???
• 14:0414:04, 20 October 2012 diff hist +34 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →National Geographic Society: broken link, statement needs to be deleted or new citation found
• 14:0214:02, 20 October 2012 diff hist +29 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Cement: sorry - wrong template
• 14:0014:00, 20 October 2012 diff hist +32 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Cement: false statement, please find credible reference
• 13:5413:54, 20 October 2012 diff hist +512 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: please state your CURRENT and CREDIBLE reference

17 October 2012

• 13:0413:04, 17 October 2012 diff hist −105 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon Undid revision 518292692 by Taivo (talk) Pls follow WP:OR, and WP:SYN and give credible references
• 13:0113:01, 17 October 2012 diff hist +1,594 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: please state your CURRENT and CREDIBLE reference
• 08:1308:13, 17 October 2012 diff hist +923 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon new topic: general review of article
• 07:5407:54, 17 October 2012 diff hist −105 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Cement: deleting archeologically proven wrong statement - see discussion and at least 12 references
• 07:5307:53, 17 October 2012 diff hist +726 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: evidence to review article

16 October 2012

• 20:1320:13, 16 October 2012 diff hist +805 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: comment
• 20:1020:10, 16 October 2012 diff hist +639 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: first changes
• 15:2015:20, 16 October 2012 diff hist 0 Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →National Geographic Society: correction of year - see reference: it's 1988
• 15:1715:17, 16 October 2012 diff hist +799 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: proposal for connection between real archeology and theology
• 12:3812:38, 16 October 2012 diff hist +509 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: no WP:OR on my part...
• 12:3312:33, 16 October 2012 diff hist +1,139 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →New thoughts on Cement: lime plaster = a form of cement / not all cement is lime plaster
• 12:0712:07, 16 October 2012 diff hist +2 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Whole article not objective, focuses on disproving with non-fact based information.: spelling
• 12:0612:06, 16 October 2012 diff hist +1,136 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Whole article not objective, focuses on disproving with non-fact based information.: specific change proposal based on real archeology
• 09:5109:51, 16 October 2012 diff hist +1 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Cement: titel correction
• 09:5009:50, 16 October 2012 diff hist +4,029 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Cement: updating article to archeological discoveries after 1978

15 October 2012

• 09:3209:32, 15 October 2012 diff hist +3,986 Talk:Archaeology and the Book of Mormon →Whole article not objective, focuses on disproving with non-fact based information.: revision proposals