Non-relativistic spacetime
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
In physics, a non-relativistic spacetime is any mathematical model that fuses n–dimensional space and m–dimensional time into a single continuum other than the (3+1) model used in relativity theory.
In the sense used in this article, a spacetime is deemed "non-relativistic" if (a) it deviates from (3+1) dimensionality, even if the postulates of special or general relativity are otherwise satisfied, or if (b) it does not obey the postulates of special or general relativity, regardless of the model's dimensionality.
Introduction
[edit]There are many reasons why spacetimes may be studied that do not satisfy relativistic postulates and/or that deviate from the apparent (3+1) dimensionality of the known universe.
Galilean/Newtonian spacetime
[edit]The classic example of a non-relativistic spacetime is the spacetime of Galileo and Newton. It is the spacetime of everyday "common sense".[1] Galilean/Newtonian spacetime assumes that space is Euclidean (i.e. "flat"), and that time has a constant rate of passage that is independent of the state of motion of an observer, or indeed of anything external.[2]
Newtonian mechanics takes place within the context of Galilean/Newtonian spacetime. For a huge problem set, the results of computations using Newtonian mechanics are only imperceptibly different from computations using a relativistic model. Since computations using Newtonian mechanics are considerably simpler than those using relativistic mechanics, as well as correspond to intuition,[1] most everyday mechanics problems are solved using Newtonian mechanics.
Model systems
[edit]Efforts since 1930 to develop a consistent quantum theory of gravity have not yet produced more than tentative results.[3] The study of quantum gravity is difficult for multiple reasons. Technically, general relativity is a complex, nonlinear theory. Very few problems of significant interest admit of analytical solution, and numerical solutions in the strong-field realm can require immense amounts of supercomputer time.
Conceptual issues present an even greater difficulty, since general relativity states that gravity is a consequence of the geometry of spacetime. To produce a quantum theory of gravity would therefore require quantizing the basic units of measurement themselves: space and time.[4] A completed theory of quantum gravity would undoubtedly present a visualization of the Universe unlike any that has hitherto been imagined.
One promising research approach is to explore the features of simplified models of quantum gravity that present fewer technical difficulties while retaining the fundamental conceptual features of the full-fledged model. In particular, general relativity in reduced dimensions (2+1) retains the same basic structure of the full (3+1) theory, but is technically far simpler.[4] Multiple research groups have adopted this approach to studying quantum gravity.[5]
"New physics" theories
[edit]The idea that relativistic theory could be usefully extended with the introduction of extra dimensions originated with Nordstöm's 1914 modification of his previous 1912 and 1913 theories of gravitation. In this modification, he added an additional dimension resulting in a 5-dimensional vector theory. Kaluza–Klein theory (1921) was an attempt to unify relativity theory with electromagnetism. Although at first enthusiastically welcomed by physicists such as Einstein, Kaluza–Klein theory was too beset with inconsistencies to be a viable theory.[6]: i–viii
Various superstring theories have effective low-energy limits that correspond to classical spacetimes with alternate dimensionalities than the apparent dimensionality of the observed universe. It has been argued that all but the (3+1) dimensional world represent dead worlds with no observers. Therefore, on the basis of anthropic arguments, it would be predicted that the observed universe should be one of (3+1) spacetime.[7]
Space and time may not be fundamental properties, but rather may represent emergent phenomena whose origins lie in quantum entanglement.[8]
It had occasionally been wondered whether it is possible to derive sensible laws of physics in a universe with more than one time dimension. Early attempts at constructing spacetimes with extra timelike dimensions inevitably met with issues such as causality violation and so could be immediately rejected,[7] but it is now known that viable frameworks exist of such spacetimes that can be correlated with general relativity and the Standard Model, and which make predictions of new phenomena that are within the range of experimental access.[6]: 99–111
Possible observational evidence
[edit]Observed high values of the cosmological constant may imply kinematics significantly different from relativistic kinematics. A deviation from relativistic kinematics would have significant cosmological implications in regards to such puzzles as the "missing mass" problem.[9]
To date, general relativity has satisfied all experimental tests. However, proposals that may lead to a quantum theory of gravity (such as string theory and loop quantum gravity) generically predict violations of the weak equivalence principle in the 10−13 to 10−18 range.[10] Currently envisioned tests of the weak equivalence principle are approaching a degree of sensitivity such that non-discovery of a violation would be just as profound a result as discovery of a violation. Non-discovery of equivalence principle violation in this range would suggest that gravity is so fundamentally different from other forces as to require a major reevaluation of current attempts to unify gravity with the other forces of nature. A positive detection, on the other hand, would provide a major guidepost towards unification.[10]
Condensed matter physics
[edit]Research on condensed matter has spawned a two-way relationship between spacetime physics and condensed matter physics:
- On the one hand, spacetime approaches have been used to investigate certain condensed matter phenomena. For example, spacetimes with local non-relativistic symmetries have been investigated capable of supporting massive matter fields. This approach has been used to investigate the details of matter couplings, transport phenomena, and the thermodynamics of non-relativistic fluids.[11]
- On the other hand, condensed matter systems can be used to mimic certain aspects of general relativity. Although intrinsically non-relativistic, these systems provide models of curved spacetime quantum field theory that are experimentally accessible. The include acoustical models in flowing fluids, Bose–Einstein condensate systems, or quasiparticles in moving superfluids, such as the quasiparticles and domain walls of the A-phase of superfluid He-3.[12]
Examples of model systems
[edit]![[icon]](/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small} | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (August 2017) |
Examples of "new physics" theories
[edit] | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (August 2017) |
Examples of possible observational evidence
[edit] | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (August 2017) |
Examples in condensed matter physics
[edit] | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (August 2017) |
Further reading
[edit]See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Davis, Philip J. (2006). Mathematics & Common Sense: A Case of Creative Tension. Wellesley, Massachusetts: A.K. Peters. p. 86. ISBN 9781439864326.
- ^ Rynasiewicz, Robert. "Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 24 March 2017.
- ^ Rovelli, Carlo (2000). "Notes for a brief history of quantum gravity". arXiv:gr-qc/0006061.
- ^ a b Calip, Steve. "My Research". UC Davis Department of Physics. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- ^ Carlip, Steven (2003). Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions (PDF). Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–8. ISBN 9780521545884. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
- ^ a b Bars, Itzhak; Terning, John (2010). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time. Springer. ISBN 9780387776378.
- ^ a b Tegmark, Max (1997). "On the dimensionality of spacetime". Class. Quantum Grav. 14 (4): L69–L75. arXiv:gr-qc/9702052. Bibcode:1997CQGra..14L..69T. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/4/002. S2CID 15694111.
- ^ Cowen, Ron (19 November 2015). "The quantum source of space-time". Nature. 527 (7578): 290–293. Bibcode:2015Natur.527..290C. doi:10.1038/527290a. PMID 26581274. S2CID 4447880. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
- ^ Aldrovandi, R.; Aldrovandi, A.L.; Crispino, L.C.B.; Pereira, J.G. (1999). "Non-Relativistic Spacetimes with Cosmological Constant". Class. Quantum Grav. 16 (2): 495–506. arXiv:gr-qc/9801100. Bibcode:1999CQGra..16..495A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/2/013. S2CID 16691405.
- ^ a b Overduin, James; Everitt, Francis; Mester, John; Worden, Paul (2009). "The Science Case for STEP". Advances in Space Research. 43 (10): 1532–1537. arXiv:0902.2247. Bibcode:2009AdSpR..43.1532O. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2009.02.012. S2CID 8019480.
- ^ Geracie, Michael; Prabhu, Kartik; Roberts, Matthew M. (October 2015). "Curved non-relativistic spacetimes, Newtonian gravitation and massive matter". Journal of Mathematical Physics. 56 (10): 103505. arXiv:1503.02682. Bibcode:2015JMP....56j3505G. doi:10.1063/1.4932967. ISSN 0022-2488. S2CID 119701218.
- ^ Visser, Matt (2002). "Analogue models of and for gravity". Gen. Rel. Grav. 34 (10): 1719–1734. arXiv:gr-qc/0111111. Bibcode:2001gr.qc....11111V. doi:10.1023/a:1020180409214. S2CID 14342213.