Jump to content

Interstate Commerce Act of 1887

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Motor Carrier Act of 1935)
Interstate Commerce Act of 1887
Great Seal of the United States
Long titleAn act to regulate commerce
Enacted bythe 49th United States Congress
EffectiveApril 7, 1887
Citations
Public lawPub. L. 49–104
Statutes at Large24 Stat. 379
Legislative history
  • Passed the U.S. House on February 4, 1887 
  • Passed the U.S. Senate on February 4, 1887 
Major amendments
Act of February 4, 1887 (Interstate Commerce Act)
This article is part of
a series about
Grover Cleveland
Personal
28th Governor of New York
22nd & 24th President of the United States
First term
Second term
Presidential campaigns
Post-presidency
Grover Cleveland's signature
Seal of the President of the United States

The Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 is a United States federal law that was designed to regulate the railroad industry, particularly its monopolistic practices.[1] The Act required that railroad rates be "reasonable and just", but did not empower the government to fix specific rates. It also required that railroads publicize shipping rates and prohibited short haul or long haul fare discrimination, a form of price discrimination against smaller markets, particularly farmers in Western or Southern Territory compared to the official Eastern states.[2][3] The Act created a federal regulatory agency, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), which it charged with monitoring railroads to ensure that they complied with the new regulations.

With the passage of the Act, the railroad industry became the first industry subject to federal regulation by a regulatory body.[4] It was later amended to regulate other modes of transportation and commerce.

Background of the act

[edit]

The act was passed in response to rising public concern with the growing power and wealth of corporations, particularly railroads, during the late nineteenth century. Railroads had become the principal form of transportation for both people and goods, and the prices they charged and the practices they adopted greatly influenced individuals and businesses. In some cases, the railroads were perceived to have abused their power as a result of too little competition. Railroads also banded together to form pools and trusts that fixed rates at higher levels than they could otherwise command.[5]

Responding to a widespread public outcry, states passed numerous pieces of legislation. Through the 1870s various constituencies, notably the Grange movement representing farmers, lobbied Congress to regulate railroads. While the Senate would investigate and report its findings and recommendations in 1874, Congress declined to step in, mirroring the lack of consensus in approach. In the 1886 decision on Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company v. Illinois however,[6] the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state laws regulating interstate railroads were unconstitutional because they violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which gives Congress the exclusive power "to regulate Commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."[7] With many of those questions of approach decided, Congress passed the Interstate Commerce Act the following year; it was signed into law by President Grover Cleveland on February 4, 1887.[8]: 12 

The act worked to keep rates and railroad revenue up on routes where competition existed.[9] It did this by attempting to force publicity about rates and make rebates and discrimination illegal. ('Discrimination' meant lower rates for certain customers, e.g. politicians, large customers, sharp bargainers, long haul shippers, shippers in competitive markets, low season travelers.)[9] Railroads saw that competition made it hard to pay their stockholders and bondholders the amount of money promised to them, and competition was therefore "bad."[10]

Jurisdiction of the act

[edit]

The act also created the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), the first independent regulatory agency of the US government. As part of its mission, the ICC heard complaints against the railroads and issued cease and desist orders to combat unfair practices. While the ICC was empowered to investigate and prosecute railroads and other transportation companies that were alleged to have violated the act, its jurisdiction was limited to companies that operated across state lines. Over time the courts would further narrow the agency's authority, and in 1903 Congress established the Department of Commerce and Labor and its Bureau of Corporations to study and report on wider industries and their monopolistic practices. By 1906, the Supreme Court had ruled in favor of a railroad company in fifteen out of the sixteen cases over which it presided.[11]

Amendments

[edit]

Early twentieth century

[edit]

Congress passed a minor amendment to the Act in 1903, the Elkins Act.[12] Major amendments were enacted in 1906 and 1910. The Hepburn Act of 1906 authorized the ICC to set maximum railroad rates, and extended the agency's authority to cover bridges, terminals, ferries, sleeping cars, express companies and oil pipelines.[13] The Mann-Elkins Act of 1910 strengthened ICC authority over railroad rates and expanded its jurisdiction to include regulation of telephone, telegraph, and cable companies.[14] The Valuation Act of 1913 required the ICC to organize a Bureau of Valuation that would assess the value of railroad property. This information would be used to set freight shipping rates.[15]

Motor Carrier Act of 1935

[edit]

In 1935, Congress passed the Motor Carrier Act, which amended the Interstate Commerce Act to regulate bus lines and trucking as common carriers.[16]

Later amendments

[edit]

Congress enacted simplifying and reorganizing amendments in 1978, 1983 and 1994.[17]

Deregulation

[edit]

Congress passed various railroad deregulation measures in the 1970s and 1980s. The Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (often called the "4R Act") gave railroads more flexibility in pricing and service arrangements. The 4R Act also transferred some powers from the ICC to the newly formed United States Railway Association, a government corporation, regarding the disposition of bankrupt railroads.[18] The Staggers Rail Act of 1980 further reduced ICC authority by allowing railroads to set rates more freely and become more competitive with the trucking industry.[19]

The Motor Carrier Act of 1980 deregulated the trucking industry.[20]

Abolition

[edit]

Congress abolished the ICC in 1995 (see Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act) and many of its remaining functions were transferred to a new agency, the Surface Transportation Board.[21]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379, approved 1887-02-04 (text).
  2. ^ Potter, David. M. (1947). "Discriminatory Freight Rates: Implications of the Interstate Commerce Commission's Regulatory Powers" The University of Chicago Law Review, 15(1), Article 8. Accessed 2017-03-28.
  3. ^ Editors, Law Review. (1947). "The Historical Development of Easter-Southern Freight Rate Relationships" Law and Contemporary Problems, 12(1). Accessed 2017-03-28.
  4. ^ U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Washington, D.C. "Our Documents: Interstate Commerce Act (1887)." Accessed 2010-10-19.
  5. ^ Johnson, Emory R.; Van Metre, Thurman W. (1918). "Chapter XVIII. Pools and Traffic Associations". Principles of Railroad Transportation. New York: D. Appleton. pp. 292–307.
  6. ^ U.S. Supreme Court. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company v. Illinois, 118 U.S. 557 (1886), 7 S. Ct. 4, 30 L. Ed. 244
  7. ^ U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3.
  8. ^ Kohlmeier, Louis M. Jr. (1969). The Regulators: Watchdog Agencies and the Public Interest. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 978-0-06-043747-3.
  9. ^ a b Acworth, W.M. (1905-12-01). "The Recent History of Federal Control of Railroads in the United States". Railroad Gazette. XXXIX (22): 170.
  10. ^ White, Richard; Stanford University (2008). "Kilkenny Cats: Transcontinental railroads, destructive competition, and the odd road to North American modernity." Archived 2010-06-16 at the Wayback Machine Paper presented at the Penn Economic History Forum Archived 2010-06-15 at the Wayback Machine, University of Pennsylvania, Department of History, Philadelphia, PA, October 3, 2008.
  11. ^ Louis Hacker & Benjamin Kendrick The United States Since 1865, 236
  12. ^ Elkins Act, 57th Congress, Sess. 2, ch. 708, 32 Stat. 847, approved 1903-02-19.
  13. ^ Hepburn Act of 1906, 59th Congress, Sess. 1, ch. 3591, 34 Stat. 584, approved 1906-06-29.
  14. ^ Mann-Elkins Act of 1910, 61st Congress, ch. 309, 36 Stat. 539, approved 1910-06-18.
  15. ^ Valuation Act, 62nd Congress, ch. 92, 37 Stat. 701, enacted 1913-03-01.
  16. ^ Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 543, ch. 498, approved 1935-08-09.
  17. ^ Revised Interstate Commerce Act of 1978, Pub.L. 95–473, 92 Stat. 1337, 49 U.S.C. § 10101, approved 1978-10-17. Pub.L. 97–449, 96 Stat. 2413, approved 1983-01-12. Pub.L. 103–272, approved 1994-07-05.
  18. ^ Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act, Pub. L. 94-210, 90 Stat. 31, 45 U.S.C. § 801, approved 1976-02-05.
  19. ^ Staggers Rail Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-448, 94 Stat. 1895, approved 1980-10-14.
  20. ^ Motor Carrier Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-296, 94 Stat. 793, approved 1980-07-01.
  21. ^ Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act, Pub. L. 104–88 (text) (PDF), 109 Stat. 803; 1995-12-29.
[edit]
Wikisource has the text of the 1905 New International Encyclopedia article "Interstate Commerce Act".
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interstate_Commerce_Act_of_1887&oldid=1250282420#Motor_Carrier_Act_of_1935"