Jump to content

MediaWiki talk:Edittools/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10

Small problem

On the IPA tab, there is no space between əɚ so when you click on it, it enters both characters. Can that be fixed please? CodeCat (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

 Fixed Anomie⚔ 17:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Space in ref tags

I wanted to add a space in <references /> and <ref name="" /> (as proper xml markup) in MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert.js, but I'm a little confused by the tokens used there. Do I need to insert ".", "_"or something else even? — Edokter (talk) — 20:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Wow, that is weird and confusing. For <references /> you need a ".". For <ref name="+" />, you need "_" because it's in the part after the "+" (but the space between "ref" and "name" needs a ".", because it's before the "+"). Anomie⚔ 20:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
And yet, "Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages" uses "_" and has no "+", which I found out is the place the cursor will be inserted. These tokens should be documented. — Edokter (talk) — 23:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
I've made the edit. If it breaks, I will revert. (Seems to work fine though.) — Edokter (talk) — 09:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
I use <nowiki><references /></nowiki> and <nowiki><ref name="+" /></nowiki> to put spaces on Edittools buttons on my wiki. — T13   ( C • M • Click to learn how to view this signature as intended ) 16:18, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Apostrophes and quotation marks

Maybe it's just me, but I can't always type ' and " and it would be really nice if there were something I could click on to insert them. Closest things on there that I could find are ′ and ″, which just aren't the same. -— Isarra ༆ 04:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

On a PC keyboard, the apostophe ' is normally on the middle row, two keys to the right of the letter L; the double quote " is either on the same key as ⇧ Shift+' (USA layout), or on the top row as ⇧ Shift+2 (British layout). The characters generated by the fourth and fifth items in the "Insert" and "Wiki markup" selections are ″ and ′ which are Unicode U+2033 "Double Prime" and U+2032 "Prime" respectively; these do not count as valid quotation marks. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, keys are there, but they doesn't always work. Seems to only be a problem when I'm on windows, though, so it's not likely to come up for others (my windows configuration is a little odd). It's just that there are so many other things here, just not what I seem to most often wind up needing. -— Isarra ༆ 02:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
My Windows/Firefox combination does occasionally behave strangely. My keyboard is UK layout, like this (but black, not coloured), and for no apparent reason Firefox can suddenly decide that my keyboard is the USA layout, and remaps the keys - those marked ¬"£@~# actually generate ~@#"|\ and (no kidding) it has actually flipped over to the other mapping whilst posting this. If I switch to a different application, the mapping is correct; switch back to Firefox, the mapping is wrong again. Closing and restarting Firefox always fixes this; it has sometimes fixed itself with no apparent intervention (let's see if that happens today). --Redrose64 (talk) 12:55, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
@Redrose64:, sounds like you should check this out. — This, that and the other (talk) 12:31, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Oh, I see I'm a bit late to the party! I must have just looked at the date "6", and thought it was a current discussion... — This, that and the other (talk) 07:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Sign your posts on talk pages

Again and again, new users get confused by the mention "Sign your posts on talk pages: ~~~~ " just below the edit box. So we get plenty of signatures in mainspace or in edit summaries. There is no need to have this displayed in mainspace. In wiki markup, this can be achieved by {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{ns:0}} | | '''Sign your posts on talk pages:''' ~~\~~ }}; but I don't know if this also works for MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert.js, which replaces MediaWiki:Edittools when js is on. In addition, in the mention '''Cite your sources:''' <ref></ref>, "cite" may link to the tutorial on citing sources, I also don't know how to link in js. Cenarium (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

I definitely support hiding the "Sign your posts on talk pages" note in the mainspace. Theopolisme (talk) 17:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Agreed. Please fix this, if possible. –Quiddity (talk) 19:31, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
User:This, that and the other/MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert.js ought to fix this problem for all users who are using charinsert.js instead of edittools (which is probably everyone other than those few users who have disabled the "new" edit toolbar). However, I don't seem to be able to test the code and confirm that it works. Does someone want to have a go? — This, that and the other (talk) 08:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
TTO, I'm thinking you'll have to test it on test.wikipedia because of the way the fallbacks work. I'll see if I can test it there. What result exactly is your modification suppose to accomplish? Technical 13 (talk) 13:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
I tried to test it on testwiki (it's the gadget "This, that and the other's test gadget" at the bottom of the gadgets list) but couldn't get it to work. I don't think the code's broken... but...
Basically the idea is that any token beginning with that weird Unicode character (I chose it because I didn't think anyone would ever want to insert it) will not be displayed in namespace 0. — This, that and the other (talk) 00:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
I copied there edittools, edittools.js, Gadget-charinsert.js with your modification and Gadget-charinsert.css, and it seems to work (gadget is last from test mode, enabled by default, same as here). What do you think of also linking to the tutorial on citing sources ?
The "signature and timestamp" box in the newer editing help box (at the top of the edit window) should also likewise be removed from mainspace. However, this doesn't seem to be handled at our level, but at the wmf level. Thanks, Cenarium (talk) 15:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
@Cenarium: By newer editing box, do you mean Wikipedia:RefToolbar? That should lead to the needed talkpage for js-tweaking requests.
I'd wholeheartedly agree with replacing the "Sign your posts on talk pages ..." messages, in mainspace, with a link to that citations tutorial. (Possibly it should be in a new tab/window/target, like how the "Editing help (opens in new window)" works.) –Quiddity (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Er, everybody has Wikipedia:RefToolbar in one form or another (it can be suppressed with some CSS, but Cenarium hasn't done that). Cenarium, which version are you using? --Redrose64 (talk) 19:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
We can totally disable all 3 versions, by turning off "Show edit toolbar (requires JavaScript)" and "Enable enhanced editing toolbar" in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing. ;)
I'm not sure what shows up for IP users with javascript completely turned off, my tests with Opera's F12 toggle were inconclusive (RefToolbar 2.0b was present and seemed fully functional). –Quiddity (talk) 20:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Cenarium, do you mean that you want to hide the "signature" button on the edit toolbar in article space? This could be done by adding body.ns-0 a.tool-button[rel=signature] { display: none } to MediaWiki:Common.css. — This, that and the other (talk) 02:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I mean the toolbar which shows up by default to editors at the top of the edit window (registered or not). The toolbars that can be activated from options aren't the same (icons are not in the same order and no cite section / reftoolbar). The icon , which stands for "Signature and timestamp" likewise gives the four tildes, which isn't needed in mainspace. Okay, I'll ask at MediaWiki:Common.css then.
So for edittools, based on testwiki this should work, I'll go ahead with the edit to MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert.js next time. Cenarium (talk) 05:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
It's done, and it works fine. Cenarium (talk) 22:21, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

angle brackets

In Symbols and IPA (English), "⟨+⟩" should be replaced with {{angle bracket}}. There are accessibility issues and occasional changes that are better handled from a centralized location. — kwami (talk) 07:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

° ″ ′ should be changed to their normal order, ° ′ ″. — kwami (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, considering that ″ (double prime) and ′ (prime) are used to denote seconds and minutes respectively. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
  • kwami has requested that ⟨+⟩ be replaced with {{Angle bracket|+}} on this page in the IPA (English section) as well as the matching section on MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert.js on or about line 43 in the code. I support this change based on my understanding of what the template does. He or she would also like ° ″ ′ reordered to ° ′ ″, but I agree with Rose that these should stay as they are because of the way they are correctly used to represent degrees, minutes, and seconds respectively. Thank you for your consideration. Technical 13 (talk) 02:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Actually, Rose agrees with me, as they are currently out of order (degrees, seconds, minutes).
I'm also requesting the brackets be replaced in the symbol section. — kwami (talk) 02:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
To clarify my position: I agree with Kwamikagami that ″ and ′ are in reverse order. I've not amended it because (out of the two pages to edit MediaWiki:Edittools and MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert.js), I have never edited the script itself; and I was rather hoping that either MZMcBride (who created it) or Anomie (who has made the most edits to that script in the last two years) would have offered an opinion, either on why it was done like that, or why it should remain as is.
I have no opinion on the angle brackets.
@Technical 13:: if you attempt to ping somebody but it fails because you got the casing wrong (in this case spelling Redrose64 with two capital R), amending the post won't trigger a ping. The (correct) link to the other user and your sig need to go on in the same edit. But I would have seen it anyway, because of watchlist. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
The angle brackets now present under Math and logic are U+27E8 ⟨ MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET and U+27E9 ⟩ MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET, so they should remain there. There are also the generic &lang; and &rang; (⟨ ⟩) as used in {{angle bracket}}, which could be included under symbols. — Edokter (talk) — 12:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
I swapped ″ and ′ (also in gadget), so that part  Done. I'll note that Edittools needs a big deal of updating to be in sync with the gadget. — Edokter (talk) — 12:56, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
I can't seem to paste in the 'normal' punctuation version of the angle brackets; they keep getting converted to the CJK related bracket upon saving/previewing, and I don't know what's causing it. Is there another way to put in 〈 and 〉 (&x2329; / &x232A;), with some sort of escape sequence? — Edokter (talk) — 23:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 120#Displaying angle brackets for an explanation of what's going on there. Anomie⚔ 01:30, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
In that case, it's best to leave these in. What is the compelling reason to replace it with the template using the HTML entities? — Edokter (talk) — 03:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Because those brackets do not display on all browsers. We set up a template because some readers insisted on using greater-than and less-than signs, or Chinese brackets; the template uses the consensus form, and can be changed as consensus evolves. We are slowly going through WP and replacing all instances of the brackets with the template, except in mathematical formula. It's not useful to have the edit window working at crossed purposes with that consensus. Also, if we decide to format them differently, or change which brackets we use, we only have to change the template and all articles will be in sync. — kwami (talk) 06:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
My testing on XP and all 4 major browsers show that only IE has trouble displaying the angles, both using the numerical entiries and the &am;lang;/&rang; entities. Opera and Chrome show all the original assigned characters, and Firefox substitutes the deprecated x23xx characters for the mathematical x27xx ones. The template now use the named entities (with the unicode font), but the conclusion there is also that there currently is no universal solution. — Edokter (talk) — 12:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
OK. I think using the template is the best solution; they actually do display in IE on XP. — Edokter (talk) — 13:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Duplication

You forgot one. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:34, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hmm. Why are those under "Wiki markup"? — Edokter (talk) — 14:15, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
For as long as I remember, the "Wiki markup" set has begun by repeating the whole of the "Insert" set apart from the boldface instructions to "Sign your posts on talk pages:" and "Cite your sources:". The text "Insert:" and "Wiki markup:" is added to the "Wiki markup" set, presumably so that you can see which symbols are common, and which are extra. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:42, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
That seems very redundant, not to mention confusing. I think we should avoid such duplication by either separating or merging them. — Edokter (talk) — 16:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
I would prefer not to separate, since I use both sets: I leave the dropdown on "Wiki markup" pretty much all the time, since I know that I can get to both sets without fiddling with menus. I think that the "Insert" set is on a separate option in order not to confuse the less experienced by offering things like <pre></pre> which they will hardly ever need to use at first. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
  • I'd actually like to see a couple new sets added for things like "Template code" "JavaScript code" "CSS code" etc... But, I'll open a separate edit request for that once I have a sandbox version created. Technical 13 (talk) 21:36, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Kill the beast

I'm still hoping for a day in which we can permanently kill this beast. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

We might need a fallback option (of some sort) for users without javascript?
One possibility: Add a link to same content, next to the link in edit-mode that currently says:
Editing help (opens in new window)
So they would see this instead:
Editing help (opens in new window) Special characters (opens in new window)
Note: That Cheatsheet link is currently only visible for users without javascript. (For everyone else, it was hidden in gerrit 76069 (and was briefly discussed at MediaWiki talk:Edithelppage#Vanished?))
Or something else. –Quiddity (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC) rewritten 06:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
You can kill it yourself; you have to disable "Show edit toolbar (requires JavaScript)", (which is the old toolbar the edittools are linked to) under Editing options and the "CharInsert" gadget. — Edokter (talk) — 13:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Why is this loaded for readers?

MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert.js has no use when reading the articles, so there is no reason to load all this code when action is not "edit" or "submit". Consider spliting it into a small "loader" and a "core" module which would be loaded only when needed. Helder.wiki 12:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

I de-obsfucated the link; I thought you talked about this message (MediaWiki:Edittools). But I agree the gadget should load conditionally. — Edokter (talk) — 13:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
I believe it would require something like this:
Helder.wiki 13:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
That would still load CharInsert by default. That should not be default, right? — Edokter (talk) — 14:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Edokter, yes, I missed that "default" in the first version of the code, which should be removed. Not that it would make any difference, because no user has the (non-existing) right "hidden". So, it would be loaded by default, for no one ;-).
Moreover, considering the next section, the second definition should contain "|dependencies=jquery.textSelection". Helder.wiki 18:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Is the edit page detection soundproof? Upload pages also have an edit form. I also suggest keeping the name "charinsert" for the loader as to not mess with users current settings (for those who disabled it). — Edokter (talk) — 13:54, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
I updated the examples above based on your comments. I wasn't seeing the tools on Special:Upload because of I custom CSS, but now I see it is also there. Helder.wiki 15:20, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
That should work in theory. Ping me as soon something goes wrong. — Edokter (talk) — 15:39, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
I just followed the procedure above on test.wikipedia.org, so the behavior of the gadget can be tested in the sandbox before deploying the changes here on English Wikipedia. Helder.wiki 15:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Already done. Works as advertised. — Edokter (talk) — 15:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Great! Helder.wiki 16:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Is it just me or are pages loading much faster now? — Edokter (talk) — 16:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Edittools.js

Is MediaWiki:Edittools.js still in use? It doesn't seem to be called from anywhere. — Edokter (talk) — 14:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

By the search results, I don't think it is in use on English Wikipedia. But it could be imported from some other wiki? Maybe add a mw.log.deprecate() call for a few days/weeks and then it can be deleted (if that is what you want to do). Helder.wiki 14:45, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
If other wikis are importing edittools.js, it is broken now anyway. Importing cross-wiki scripts is highly unreliable. — Edokter (talk) — 18:15, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
It may be unreliable, but it is the only alternative to forking available at the moment (and it is kind of recommended by mw:ResourceLoader/Migration guide (users)#Keep gadgets central). Helder.wiki 19:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Central as in Meta or MediaWiki.org, OK. Is there a global search tool? — Edokter (talk) — 19:27, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
There is a bug about this and if I remember correctly Ori.livneh has access to a tool which can makes this kind of search. Helder.wiki 20:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Here you go --Ori.livneh (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
That doesn't tell me if any are linked to the enwiki copy. Can you do a search for "//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edittools.js"? — Edokter (talk) — 20:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Edokter, do you mean "//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Edittools.js"? Helder.wiki 21:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes. — Edokter (talk) — 21:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 4 March 2014

Could someone make this update to MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert.js to remove a hack from 2010? Helder.wiki 13:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Or even better, since the script uses textSelection, just add the module "jquery.textSelection" to the list of dependencies of the gadget on its definition:
* charinsert[ResourceLoader|default|dependencies=jquery.textSelection]|charinsert.js|charinsert.css
and then we can remove a few more bytes of code with thisthis. Helder.wiki 14:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
One definitive solution at a time please. — Edokter (talk) — 14:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Consider only the second request then. Helder.wiki 18:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Something not right here... return; is always called. Please check your code again. — Edokter (talk) — 11:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Right! I forgot to remove that "return". Here is the fixed version, Edokter. Helder.wiki 13:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 Done. — Edokter (talk) — 13:43, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Helder.wiki Something broke; everything is inserted twice. — Edokter (talk) — 17:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Pinging TheDJ, Krinkle and Technical 13 as well. — Edokter (talk) — 17:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
It seems the first one is inserted by
            $( txtarea ).textSelection(
                'encapsulateSelection',
                { 'pre': tagOpen, 'peri': sampleText, 'post': tagClose }
            );
and the other one by
                txtarea.value = txtarea.value.substring( 0, startPos ) + tagOpen + selText
                    + tagClose + txtarea.value.substring( endPos );
So, I believe it is because we removed the "return" which existed before. For now, you can revert this change. Helder.wiki 17:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Edokter, the splitted gadget is working fine on test wiki after reverting just this ^. Helder.wiki 17:45, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Reverted (partial). Works in debug mode, cache needs to catch up. — Edokter (talk) — 17:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
OK, I'm never doing this again until I see fully working code on test.wiki. Please don't place edit requests until your code is tested. — Edokter (talk) — 17:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Edokter, TheDJ, Technical 13, Ori.livneh and others watching this page, could you test the current of the gadget which is configured on test.wikipedia.org? I removed the custom functions which are duplicating functionality already provided by MediaWiki (-5,401 bytes!), added a missing dependency (mediawiki.action.edit), and worked fine in my first tests. Indeed, it even works in a case where enwiki's code fails: try it in a custom field created with <inputbox> on English Wikipedia and then on testwiki. Helder.wiki 22:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Seems to work. Why does it depend on mediawiki.action.edit? Also, There is really no need for type checking here. — Edokter (talk) — 22:40, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Edokter, mw.toolbar.insertTags and the old window.insertTags are defined in that module. About the type, I was just trying to reduce the number of warnings on jsHint (maybe there is a config to ignore this). Helder.wiki 23:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
I've updated the code. — Edokter (talk) — 22:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Recent CharInsert changes breaks certain customizations

Edokter Hi there - long time fan but mostly try to keep Wikisource up to date with your latest WP changes/advances...

Long story short - with the changes to CharInsert over the past 2 or 3 days, certain custom templates added via my common.js that also happen to be set to "hidden" using the Entries prefixed with ␥ (U+2425 SYMBOL FOR DELETE FORM TWO) will not appear in the article namespace (namespace 0) "trick" no longer insert properly nor are reflected correctly in the toolbar. They still "hide" from display in the mainspace as always. Any idea how to restore the previous behavior? -- George Orwell III (talk) 01:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

George Orwell III, I don't understand what is the problem. Could you provide a small example of what happens now and what was happening before? Helder.wiki 14:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
well a custom set of ...
␥{\{hws|+|}}  ␥{\{hwe|+|}}  ␥<section.begin="+"_/>  ␥<section.end="+"_/>
... when applied, produces...
 {{hws|+}}  {{hwe|+}}  <section.begin="+ />  <section.end="+ />
... when it should have produced...
 {{hws||}}  {{hwe||}}  <section_begin="" />  <section_end="" />
Note in the 2nd example the plus symbol(s) should have been dropped all round and the lack of a 2nd piped parameter (first 2 templates) or closing quote (last 2 tags) when applied in the textarea field under edit mode (non ns-0).

To repoduce, just copy my common.js onto the test site and try inserting any of the 4 templates prefixed with ␥ (U+2425 SYMBOL FOR DELETE FORM TWO) in any namespace other than the main. -- George Orwell III (talk) 21:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

George Orwell III, I created two gadgets on testwiki:Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets: <gadget-charinsert-old> with the old code and <gadget-charinsert> with the current code. Both have the same behavior in the test case you provided. Helder.wiki 17:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Helder.wiki, Confirmed over on Wikisource - this past week's changes do not induce the behavior so it is quite possible I missed the "change" that caused this oddity altogether. Sorry for pointing fingers prematurely.

Nevertheless, I'm sure this was not always the case - it did "work" as desired at some point in time. I've removed the prefix-character from templates for now, though I'm not savy enough to troubleshoot the issue any further.

One other question (and forgive me if this is obvious to experts) but why does Gadget-charinsert-core.js need the additional dependency of mediawiki.action.edit under the revised gadget? Wasn't the whole point of creating the "loader" enough to insure that? (or shouldn't mediawiki.action.edit be a dependent when loading Gadget-charinsert.js rather than Gadget-charinsert-core.js if anything?)

p.s. - if you ever get bored, we sure could use your skills to review/improve en.wikisource's .js/.css/gadget "scheme". I have always admired Wikibooks approach to all that compared to what we got stuck with but my skill set is way below what is needed to make those kind of tweaks/improvements/overhauls and, thanks to that, voicing those long needed changes to the "community" largely falls on deaf ears.

Thanks for your time either way. Prost. -- George Orwell III (talk) 03:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

I can answer that. The -core gadget needs mediawiki.action.edit because it uses one or more funtions in that module. The loader is there for one thing only; to load the -core only when an edit page is loaded. This saves loading a lot of javascript when it is not needed. — Edokter (talk) — 11:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

adjustment

Under Latin, could we have both Ə ə and Ǝ ǝ? (Make sure that the lower-case letters are matched correctly!) They're used in different alphabets.

Under Arabic, "transcription" should really be "transliteration".

— kwami (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Done @Kwamikagami: Is this what you meant? let me know if they need to be in a different order or anything. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 10:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Perfect. (Maybe the opposite order, so the caps go from more similar to less similar, but that's not important.) — kwami (talk) 17:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
I've switched the order around. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Also, Arabic doesn't seem to be maintained here. Sorry, I'm not sure which message is the one that needs editing. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 10:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Odd. It used to be. But the labels aren't important. — kwami (talk) 17:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
@Mr. Stradivarius: You edited MediaWiki:Edittools which is the old-style cut&paste, for browsers without javascript. The clickable insertions are handled in MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert-core.js, which is pulled in by MediaWiki:Edittools.js as described in the box at the top of this page. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Ah yes, found it - thanks for that. I've updated the JavaScript version as well. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 13:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Request option to load CharInsert bar above toolbar

Is it possible to add an additional User .js settable option like charinsert.DontMove already does in the MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert-core.js script so that the CharInsert toolbar loads above/ontop of the classic/Wikieditor toolbar? Something like charinsert.LoadHigh maybe? -- George Orwell III (talk) 22:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

I believe all these options don't even work anymore since this has been moved to a gadget (as gadgets load before user js). Pinging Mr. Stradivarius and Anomie. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 12:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I think you have the wrong user here! I've never played around with JavaScript on MediaWiki in much detail. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I asumed you had some programming skills as I see you fiddle quite a lot with LUA. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 13:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Oh they still work (see Wikipedia_talk:Notifications#Typos too). Edokter you seem to have set '...DontMove' to 'true' (Why anyone wants tools below the terms of use disclaimer I'll never know) when it should have been 'false' plus you left out if(window.updateEditTools) window.updateEditTools(); as well.

Anyway, we had it "loading high" for awhile on Wikisource using something along the lines of....

            if ( window.charinsertMoveHigh ) {
                $( '.wikiEditor-ui' ).before( placeholder );
            }
... but that would up going flakey for some users after one the those core wmf upgrades. Now it just does it by itself (see here) in just one namespace!

I'll bet you're right about loading order issues though. -- George Orwell III (talk) 12:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

I see charinsertDontMove isn't working reliably anymore, sigh. I use the option because I don't want it intruding between the edit box and the summary and submit buttons (and "below the terms of use disclaimer" doesn't matter to me considering I hide that with CSS). Anomie⚔ 13:54, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
(ec) I didn't change anything here, I just tested the options in my common.js to see what they did... nothing in my case. So why would they not work for me? -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 13:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Anomie, just had an idea; If I knew the module name for the user script module, I could list it as a dependency. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 14:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Not sure. We've basically used variants of the following....
/* CharInsert specific */
window.charinsertDontMove = false;
window.editToolsRecall = true;
window.charinsertCustom = { User: ' |  =  {\{+}}  [\[+|]]  —  Æ  æ  Œ  œ  <code><nowiki>+</nowiki></code>  {\{ping|+}}' };
if(window.updateEditTools) window.updateEditTools();
... with little trouble for quite some time now. I thought the highlighted line made customization & the load order "agreeable". Other than the usual 'need to purge cache' issues, applying the above seems to work everybody either way - old style under the edit form box or stuck in between the textarea and the start of the edit summary - it works both ways.

What "we" were looking for was a third way (to load above WikiEditor) as Wikisource does a lot of transcribing (scrolling around just leads to losing the focus if you follow my drift). -- George Orwell III (talk) 14:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

@Edokter: I think it's "user", although whether depending on that would work I don't know.
@George Orwell III: The highlighted line makes charinsertCustom work and maybe editToolsRecall, but not charinsertDontMove. Anomie⚔ 10:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
@Anomie:, editToolsRecall = true; should enable ↕ as clickable pseudo-button to the left of the drop down menu. This lets you toggle between the current set selected and the previous set used in an editing session with only a single click opposed to having to open the drop-down and scroll back & forth or between two character sets over and over again.

Not sure why charinsertDontMove = false; isn't allowing CharInsert to load between the editing field and the edit form for you but I assure folks it is possible as it has been working for me for months now. -- George Orwell III (talk) 23:53, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Because false is the default. Anomie complains that true didn't work, which has now been fixed. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 01:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Listing user as a dependency seems to work on testwiki, so I will do so here. I'll see if the 'top' option works on testwiki as well. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 11:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
fwiw... the only difference I can nail down between the Wikipedia and the Wikisource approaches to the "editing tools" app scheme is that WS stopped bothering with the javascript-browser enabled (Edittools.js ?) part some time ago. Not only has the overall coding development moved away from supporting such javascripting but it would always load regardless of the condition at hand (e.g. the controlling css simply adds display: none; to the div container to "hide" the constant loading of MediaWiki:Edittools' content; just review the html source of any article already opened to edit mode to see what I'm talking about). Other than that, I'm not sure why generating the CharInsert bar "in between" works for some folks but not others. -- George Orwell III (talk) 23:53, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
@Edokter:, an additional update -- after also adding the dependency on 'user' over on Wikisource and re-adding ...
            if ( window.charinsertMoveHigh ) {
                $( '.wikiEditor-ui' ).before( placeholder );
            }
back into MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert-core.js there, the option charinsertMoveHigh = true; is valid & working properly again for us. Its up to folks here if they want to duplicate the option(s) currently used on WS I guess. -- George Orwell III (talk) 05:26, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I will experiment. May I suggest renaming the option to window.charinsertMoveTop; "high" is not a common term used in programming. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 09:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 Done -- switched window.charinsertMoveHigh to window.charinsertMoveTop (+ changed documentation) on Wikisource. -- George Orwell III (talk) 09:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
When I first saw "LoadHigh" in this thread, I was reminded of the MS-DOS command LOADHIGH. This was used when invoking a TSR program to persuade it to load in a segment between A000:0000 and FFFF:000F - otherwise it would reduce the memory available for real-mode user programs. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:36, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Problem: The current (wikisource) MoveTop only works with the enhanced toolbar enabled. It also gains a blue background as a result of being part of the enhanced toolbar. Are these traits intended? -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 10:19, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The blue background (actually ghostWhite) for all 3 possible positions is new on WS because the original inherited "blue" upon using LoadTop over there was visually irritating - I don't know if the same holds true here or has any color inherited here on WP at all. I'm not so sure the blue was being inherited from WikiEditor; at any rate if "we" can plain old white back somehow, I'd make the switch for all 3 possible positions.

If we can get it to load above the Classic toolbar, that would be great too -- but not a deal breaker for us.

Its obvious VisualEditor is to be the future default for sites as "big" as Wikipedia while WikiEditor seems to be to be geared more towards the "lesser" wikis such as Wikisource. The Classic toolbar is going to be more trouble than its worth some point in the future. Still, some folks swear by it so it would be neat if could be done too.

Its hard to get folks to accept simple facts like that - things such as the popularity/need for the RefToolbar here translates to a big honkin' waste of resources elsewhere. I wish the developers would just come up with one interface (a single blank toolbar) and let folks plug in (buttons or menus) what they want after that. -- George Orwell III (talk) 13:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

I tend to be conservative when adding options; there can be too many. And the perfectionist that I am, I'd have to fix the CSS as well to adapt all the borders. I'm not ready to add it just yet... I'd like to see some demand from the community for a top loading charinsert. Perhaps you can organize a small RfC. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 18:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit request

I don't think that it's necessary. It's already in "Insert" and "Wiki markup" (third link from the left, between em-dash and single prime); and also in "Math and logic" (fifth from left, between the dot operator and the asterisk operator). --Redrose64 (talk) 21:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
What Redrose said... already present three times. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 23:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Individual customization?

Is it possible for an editor to customize this for individual use without replicating all the .js files? Alternatively, would it be possible to get a combined <code><nowiki></nowiki></code> option in the list of tools? I find I use this combination quite frequently; since the tool doesn't maintain focus on the selected text once it is wrapped, I have to re-select the desired text to apply the second wrap.

Also, just a quibble, but is there a way to wrap pairs in the tools so that they don't split across lines? Currently, in my browser, there is a line break between <s> and </s>. Thanks for any assistance you could provide!—D'Ranged 1 VTalk 01:47, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

I support addition of <code><nowiki></nowiki></code> to Edittools. I constantly use these together and made the same suggestion at MediaWiki talk:Edittools/Archive 8#code and nowiki in one step. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:45, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
I support PrimeHunter. ‑‑Mandruss (talk) 18:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Sounds like a good idea to me. Support PrimeHunter as well. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 02:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
I also support, and use this combo a lot.
But, I'm also curious about the initial question. Is there a way for individual editors to easily customize CharInsert? Eg. I'd like to add {{ping}} and {{u}} and a few others, at various wikis... and Slimvirgin is asking about those at Wikipedia talk:Notifications#Typos... If not, I'll have to ask about RefToolbar custom buttons... Thanks. Quiddity (talk) 02:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert-core.js allows for users to add data to window.charinsertCustom to add additional categories to the dropdown and to append additional entries to the existing categories. For example, I have a userscript that adds an entry to help me insert {{unsigned}}. Anomie⚔ 20:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Anomie. Between those pointers, and George Orwell III's explanation at the other thread, and some searching through various users' other usages, I was able to put together this explanation with bonus headings. :) Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 19:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
I support PrimeHunter. This would be very useful. Even better would be a single template, but it might not be technically possible. --Mrjulesd (talk) 12:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

More Greek letters

While I'm at it (I didn't realize this place existed!), I'd suggest including a few more items in the Greek menu: Ϝϝ (digamma, used in some early Ancient Greek words), υ̯, and ι̯ (upsilon and iota with combining inverted breve below, used to represent the sound of digamma and a consonantal y), ᾹᾱᾸᾰῙῑῘῐῩῡῨῠ (Greek vowels with macrons and breves, used to show vowel length when necessary), and ΪϊΐῒῗΫϋΰῢῧ (letters with diaereses). I would put the digamma and iota-with-diacritic at the end of the alphabet (they're consonants not usually included in the alphabet), the letters with macrons and breves after all of the accented letters (they are strictly speaking not usually used, except in grammars and dictionaries), and the letters with diaereses with the iotas and upsilons in the lineup of accented letters. Perhaps these things have been suggested and refused, though. — Eru·tuon 09:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Inclusion of more templates

I posted in Village Pump regarding {{Polytonic}}, which till recently was included in the special character inserter below the edit box. This template is now deprecated, and I have been adding {{lang|grc|}} as a replacement for it in articles on Ancient Greek (which is where polytonic Greek is used). I suggested that this template should be added in the character inserter (if that's what it's supposed to be called), since {{IPA}} and {{Unicode}} are included in the IPA and Unicode menus. User:Edokter mentioned the fact that if this template is to be included, other language templates will have to be as well (perhaps {{lang|ar|}}, {{transl|ar|DIN|}}, {{transl|ar|ALA|}}, for instance, in the Arabic menu), and suggested I post the suggestion here. So here it is. — Eru·tuon 09:28, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

In case you didn't know -- you can add characters/simple templates to existing menu-sets as well as add your own new set(s). See the top section on this page for more but this should help start you on your way....
To add custom entries, adapt this code, and place it in your common.js:
// Add or modify CharInsert entries
window.charinsertCustom = { 
	"Greek": '  {\{lang|grc|+}}', 
	"Arabic": '  {\{lang|ar|+}}' 
};
Hope that helped. -- George Orwell III (talk) 23:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! I don't have much knowledge of Javascript, and the code works for me (though escaping the bracket seems to be unnecessary). — Eru·tuon 00:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

IPA request

Could ᶣ, which represents labio-palatalization, be added to the IPA menu, between ʷ and ʲ? — Eru·tuon 00:35, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't why they insist on redirecting to this talk-page (EditTools is DoA, CharInsert is its replacement) so I tweaked the edit-request to point to the desired character sets.

And fwiw - when I take the IPA character proposed for addition and run a find with it in my browser on the CharInsert-core.js page, the results say its already present (next to what looks to me like an upside down letter 'w' [ʍ]). I figure better to mention it than wind up adding a duplicate or something. -- George Orwell III (talk) 03:48, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, yeah — I also searched ᶣ in MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert-core.js, and found the non-superscript version, ɥ, which is already in the IPA menu. My Chrome find-function is incapable of distinguishing the superscript and normal versions of the character, as it is incapable of distinguishing ú and ǔ, but they are separate Unicode characters. — Eru·tuon 04:48, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

ᶣ

ᶣ appears to be missing from IPA in MediaWiki:Edittools. @Erutuon: since you noted this at Help:CharInsert. --  Gadget850 talk 11:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Looking at the histories of MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert-core.js and MediaWiki:Edittools they may be out of synch. Would someone with their head in this please check? --  Gadget850 talk 14:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Maybe the better question to ask first is who exactly is still "rendering" what is currently found under MediaWiki:Edittools? -- George Orwell III (talk) 15:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
I believe MediaWiki:Edittools renders when the Javascript in a browser fails to work, because I have seen this text-based list occasionally. Presumably my browser, for whatever reason, decided not to be able to use Javascript, and thus the Javascript-based list was replaced with the purely text one. (Speaking in rather non-scientific terms, since I know very little about these things.) — Eru·tuon 16:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Correct: MediaWiki:Edittools is a fallback for when JavaScript is disabled. --  Gadget850 talk 16:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
It's also the fallback for when Javascript is enabled, but the bits server is acting up and fails to yield all of the Javascript and CSS that is necessary for this to work. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
@Redrose64: I did not know that. Added to the help page. --  Gadget850 talk 17:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I think MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert-core.js and MediaWiki:Edittools are different in other ways as well. For instance, the Greek menu in the latter only has the standard Greek alphabet and Greek vowels with acute accents, but not all the other accented Greek characters (polytonic and ones with diaereses) that are in the former. There may be other differences in other menus. Could an editor with proper permissions compare MediaWiki:Gadget-charinsert-core.js and MediaWiki:Edittools, and where these are different, paste the list from the Javascript page to the other page? When that is done, we can update Help:CharInsert with the missing characters. — Eru·tuon 19:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Edittools

As I understand it MediaWiki:Edittools is used when JavaScript is not enabled. With IE6 and IE7, MediaWiki disables JavaScript and I am not seeing either version of CharInsert. --  Gadget850 talk 11:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

diff Happened when we made the Charinsert gadget the default, and disabling it, hides this. Seems it has been sort of uncontroversial so far, but it is a tad weird I guess. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Not complaining, just came up when I was working on Help:Internet Explorer and just wanted to understand it. --  Gadget850 talk 22:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
I was trying to go here the other day on this point. Long story short: you can stick anything you like in MediaWiki:Editools and it will become a descendent of the div element with the class of mw-editTools (which is located [semantic] document-structure wise after the edit options "field" made available during every single edit / preview session you open or re-submit) all by design.

To further detail the nuance in play here -- you don need no stinkin' .js or .css (no MediaWiki:Edittools.js, no stinkin' MediaWiki:Gadget-Edittools.js, no stinkin' java or css tweak of any kind ) in order for whatever it is that currently resides in MediaWiki:Edittools to automatically populate itself under that <div class="mw-editTools"> div container. Whether or not you actually see anything with your eyeballs [renders] in your browser is after the fact and irrelevant to the point at hand here.

No script that throws up a banner telling users to blah... blah... blah... will stop that auto populating thing from happening. No script that tries to "divert" you away by holding the core bits needed to start separate from the bulk of an actual gadget will stop that auto populating thing from happening. All we're doing is "wasting" a perfectly good, built-in div container that's made available during each and every edit / preview session with stuff nobody neither wants to cut & paste from when better crippled freeware variants exist (and Work!) nor bets they'll ever find themselves in a real life-or-death, cut & paste character emergency in there remaining lifetimes as well (remember! Edittools is still being processed on every single edit or submit for every single User: -- once again -- by design).

Stop the madness; fish or cut bait already & clean house. We can keep CharInsert as a gadget and just the way it is [if you like] but at least blank that MW message if folks are still against "freeing that div up completely". I'm sure somebody can find a more positive use for it. -- George Orwell III (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Help page

I started Help:CharInsert. Please expand and edit as needed. --  Gadget850 talk 13:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Expanded Help:CharInsert#Customization; please review. --  Gadget850 talk 13:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 14 April 2015

I'd like to request additions to the Greek menu: characters with diaereses, macrons, and breves, the letter digamma, iota and upsilon with the non-syllabic diacritic (an inverted breve) under them, and the templates {{lang|grc}} and {{lang|el}}, which are used to correctly style Ancient and Modern Greek text. The diaeresis is used in both Modern and Ancient Greek, while macrons, breves, digamma, and the iota and upsilon with a diacritic are used occasionally in Ancient Greek.

The characters Ϝϝυ̯ι̯ should be added after the last block of the plain Greek alphabet (after Ωω) because they're consonants, but rare or historical ones. Characters with diaeresis, Ϊϊΐῒῗ Ϋϋΰῢῧ, should perhaps be added at the end of their respective blocks: iota with diaeresis at the end of the iota block (after Ἷἷ) and upsilon with diaeresis at the end of the upsilon block (after Ὗὗ). I would add the macroned and breved characters ᾹᾱᾸᾰῙῑῘῐῩῡῨῠ as a new block at the very end (after ᾯᾧ), and {{lang|el|+}} {{lang|grc|+}} as a new block after that.

If my instructions are too hard to understand, here's what the code for the Greek menu should look like:

'Greek': 'ΆάΈέΉήΊίΌόΎύΏώ ΑαΒβΓγΔδ ΕεΖζΗηΘθ ΙιΚκΛλΜμ ΝνΞξΟοΠπ ΡρΣσςΤτΥυ ΦφΧχΨψΩω Ϝϝυ̯ι̯ ᾼᾳᾴᾺὰᾲᾶᾷἈἀᾈᾀἉἁᾉᾁἌἄᾌᾄἊἂᾊᾂἎἆᾎᾆἍἅᾍᾅἋἃᾋᾃἏἇᾏᾇ ῈὲἘἐἙἑἜἔἚἒἝἕἛἓ ῌῃῄῊὴῂῆῇἨἠᾘᾐἩἡᾙᾑἬἤᾜᾔἪἢᾚᾒἮἦᾞᾖἭἥᾝᾕἫἣᾛᾓἯἧᾟᾗ ῚὶῖἸἰἹἱἼἴἺἲἾἶἽἵἻἳἿἷΪϊΐῒῗ ῸὸὈὀὉὁὌὄὊὂὍὅὋὃ ῤῬῥ ῪὺῦὐὙὑὔὒὖὝὕὛὓὟὗΫϋΰῢῧ ῼῳῴῺὼῲῶῷὨὠᾨᾠὩὡᾩᾡὬὤᾬᾤὪὢᾪᾢὮὦᾮᾦὭὥᾭᾥὫὣᾫᾣὯὧᾯᾧ ᾹᾱᾸᾰῙῑῘῐῩῡῨῠ {{lang|el|+}} {{lang|grc|+}}',

Other editors may want to rearrange the order of the letters, but the whole Greek menu needs reorganization, I think. After this edit is done, MediaWiki:Edittools needs to be updated, but I can submit a separate request for that. — Eru·tuon 22:38, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done. Let me know if any changes are required. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Latest changes blanks Hebrew & Arabic sets

Moved from MediaWiki talk:Gadget-charinsert-styles.css

@Edokter: -- just a head's up & not sure if its universal but your latest changes blanked the Hebrew & Arabic (any Right-to-Left language set?) here (Win8.1/ie11) -- George Orwell III (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Still visible on my end (Chrome and IE8). The only possibility (though highly unlikely I think) is the nowrap I added to the links. Can anyone else confirm this might affect rtl links? -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 09:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
fwiw...It could just be my settings in particular. When I disable 'background-color: #f9f9f9' in IE's DOM explorer (in effect restoring 'transparent' instead of a color), the characters re-appear. I can live with it but if other folks see the same you might need to re-address this.

Ps - please see MediaWiki:EditTools talk page for an unrelated request of mine if you have the time. -- George Orwell III (talk) 10:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Astounding what IE can choke on... I'll see what I can do on Edittools. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 11:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Edittools/Archive_9&oldid=1234350310"