Draft talk:Anna Trindade Falcão
This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Edited draft
[edit]Hi!
Thank you for your feedback on my recently submitted article. I have made significant updates to the draft, incorporating the suggestions provided earlier. Below is a summary of the changes and a detailed explanation of how the subject now meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines:
Key Updates:
1. Additional References: • I have included new references from independent, reliable sources that discuss the subject’s work and its impact on the field (e.g., refs 2, 3, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23). • Additional references also highlight the significance of her role in the AXIS science team (refs 12, 13).
2. Clear Notability Criteria: • Below, I identify the three best sources that demonstrate the subject’s notability and explain how the page meets specific Wikipedia notability criteria.
1. WP:NPROF:
• Criteria #1: Impactful Research: The subject’s research has had a significant impact on the field of astrophysics. Notably, as the lead author, she identified the closest-separation pair of supermassive black holes at low redshift known to date. This finding has been widely discussed in independent, reliable sources and demonstrates the substantial influence of her work in the scholarly discipline.
2. WP:GNG:
• Significant Coverage: The subject’s work has been covered extensively by major media outlets such as CNN, Yahoo News, the BBC, and others, both nationally and internationally. These reliable and independent sources provide significant coverage of her contributions, further establishing her notability.
3. WP:ANYBIO:
• Awards and Recognized Contributions: The subject has recently accepted a NASA fellowship, an acknowledgment of her outstanding contributions to astrophysics. This honor underscores her widely recognized contributions, which are part of the enduring historical record in her field. This also fulfills WP:NPROF Criteria #2.
I hope these updates address the concerns raised in the feedback. If there are any remaining issues or areas for improvement, I’d appreciate further guidance. Please let me know if your thoughts, and if any additional adjustments are needed, or feel free to reassess the draft at your convenience.
Best regards, Franz Franzlangenbach (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC)