Draft:The Light of Britayne
Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by Citation bot (talk | contribs) 4 months ago. (Update) |
Author | Henry Lyte |
---|---|
Subject | British History, Brutus of Troy |
Genre | Nonfiction |
Publication date | 1588 |
Publication place | London, England |
Website | University of Michigan Digital Archive https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A72855.0001.001?rgn=main;view=fulltext |
The Light of Britayne; a Recorde of the honourable Originall and Antiquitie of Britaine (1588) is a book written and illustrated by Henry the Elder. It is an early history of the British Isles, and aims to trace the descent of the British from Brutus of Troy. Located inside the book is a portrait of Elizabeth I.
Background
[edit]Lyte dedicated this work, as well as another notable publication titled A niewe Herball (1578) to Elizabeth I of England. He presented a copy of this work to the queen on 24 November 1588, when she went in state to St. Paul's Cathedral to return thanks for the defeat of the Spanish Armada.[1]
Lyte wrote two small works on the same subject in 1592, which have never been printed. The manuscripts are described as ‘written with the author's own hand very neatly, an. 1592, the character small, lines close, some words in red ink, and others only scored with it,’ and he says that the latter contains ‘many pretty fancies which may be of some use … by way of reply for Oxon against the far-fetch'd antiquities of Cambridge’ [2]
References
[edit]