Draft:SmarterMail
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 7 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,228 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 21 November 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 18 November 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Theroadislong 3 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 18 November 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 3 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 18 November 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 3 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 18 November 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Theroadislong 3 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 14 November 2024 by Memer15151 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Memer15151 7 days ago. | |
Comment: Promotional marketing includes “a cost-effective alternative” “The goal was to create a reliable and accessible email software tailored for small to medium-sized businesses” “Over time, SmarterMail included additional functionalities” “SmarterMail is equipped to handle email communication and organizational tasks” “SmarterMail can be used in both on-premises setups and cloud systems. This gives organizations flexibility in how they use it” “often compared to other email servers” “positioned as a lower-cost option with compatibility for various email clients” “design emphasizes ease of use and accessibility, making it suitable for businesses without dedicated IT resources” Theroadislong (talk) 17:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I find it difficult to believe that you are not employed by the company to write this promotional draft. Theroadislong (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Sorry bui your professor should not be setting you projects like this and please read WP:SOLUTIONS. Theroadislong (talk) 01:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This is NOT an encyclopaedia article it is an advertisement. Theroadislong (talk) 22:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Needs better and more reliable sources; reads a bit promotionally. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 22:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
 | This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (November 2024) |
| Developer(s) | SmarterTools, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Initial release | 2001 |
| Written in | .NET |
| Operating system | Windows, Linux |
| Platform | Cross-platform |
| Type | Collaborative Software |
SmarterMail is an email and communication software developed by SmarterTools Inc., a software company headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.[1]
Functionality
[edit]SmarterMail manages email communication and organizational tasks while supporting standard protocols for integration with various email clients.[2] Its capabilities include email hosting, shared calendars, contact management, task organization, and basic communication tools. It works with Windows and Linux and other devices. This lets users access email and related functions through web interfaces or email clients.
Key Technical Capabilities
[edit]- Support for IMAP, POP3, and SMTP email protocols.[3]
- Supports MAPI, EWS, and EAS protocols, making it compatible with Microsoft Outlook.[3]
- Security measures, including spam filtering, SSL/TLS encryption, and two-factor authentication.[3]
- Compliance with data privacy standards such as HIPAA and GDPR.
Licensing
[edit]SmarterMail is licensed based on the number of users, allowing organizations to scale usage according to their needs.[3] Optional functionalities, such as certain synchronization features, are available as add-ons.
References
[edit]- ^ SmarterTools Releases New SmarterMail Mail Server, Provides Cost-Effective Alternative to Microsoft Exchange. Computer Weekly News. September 10, 2009. p. 117.
- ^ Musthaler, Linda (March 25, 2011). "Get smarter about your email and cut your costs by 80%". Network World. NetworkWorld. Retrieved 14 November 2024.
- ^ a b c d Rashid, Fahmida (December 23, 2013). "SmarterMail Review". PCMAG. Retrieved 18 November 2024.
- ^ Rashid, Fahmida (December 23, 2013). "SmarterMail Review". PCMAG. Retrieved 18 November 2024.
- ^ Musthaler, Linda (March 25, 2011). "Get smarter about your email and cut your costs by 80%". Network World. NetworkWorld. Retrieved 14 November 2024.