Draft:Saxdor
Submission rejected on 28 December 2024 by Spiderone (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Spiderone 5 seconds ago. Last edited by Spiderone 5 seconds ago. |
Submission declined on 28 December 2024 by Spiderone (talk).Spiderone 70 minutes ago. |
Submission declined on 28 December 2024 by Qcne (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 82 minutes ago. |
Submission declined on 28 December 2024 by Spiderone (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Spiderone 2 hours ago.
|
Submission declined on 28 December 2024 by Beachweak (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Declined by Beachweak 4 hours ago.
|
- Comment: None of the 4 references even work. As this is the 5th decline in a short space of time with no meaningful improvements, this is now rejected and will not be considered further. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The next submission with no meaningful improvement could potentially result in the article being rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Company type | Private |
---|---|
Industry | Boat manufacturing |
Founded | 2019 |
Founder | Sakari Mattila |
Area served | Worldwide |
Products | Motorboats |
Website | saxdoryachts.com |
Saxdor Yachts is a Finnish motorboat manufacturer founded in 2019 by Sakari Mattila. The company is based in Helsinki and focuses on producing lightweight motorboats for recreational use.
History
[edit]Saxdor Yachts was established by Sakari Mattila, who has prior experience in the marine industry, including roles in the creation of other boat brands such as Axopar Boats and Paragon Yachts. The company released its first model, the Saxdor 200 Sport, in 2020. This was followed by the Saxdor 320 series in 2021, which includes the GTO and GTC variants. In 2023, Saxdor introduced the Saxdor 400 series.
Models
[edit]Saxdor Yachts offers several motorboat models:
Model | Year Introduced ! |
---|---|
Saxdor 200 Sport | 2020 |
Saxdor 320 GTO | 2021 |
Saxdor 320 GTC | 2021 |
Saxdor 400 GTO | 2023 |
Market and Operations
[edit]Saxdor Yachts sells its boats through a network of dealers in Europe, North America, and other regions. Its products are aimed at recreational boaters, with models that vary in size and functionality.
Awards
[edit]The Saxdor 200 Sport won the "European Powerboat of the Year" award in 2020 in the sub-8-meter category.
References
[edit]- "Saxdor Yachts: Redefining Performance in the Boating Industry." *Boating World*, May 2021. [1]
- "European Powerboat of the Year 2020 Winners." *Yachting Monthly*, January 2020. [2]
- "Saxdor Yachts: New Boats, Fresh Designs." *Motorboat & Yachting*, June 2020. [3]
- "Saxdor Yachts Expands Dealer Network in North America." *Marine Business News*, March 2021. [4]
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.