Draft:STI Internet
Submission declined on 4 January 2025 by Snowycats (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
STI Internet
[edit]STI Internet (STI), was a Brazilian Internet service provider based in São Paulo that provided a variety of services, including dedicated and dial up internet access, web hosting and e-mail during the Web 1.0 era in Brazil.
At the time it was acquired in May, 1999, STI was the fourth largest in Brazil. [1]
History
[edit]STI Internet was originally founded as a BBS in the early 90s by Rodrigo Martinez, Mauro Bertaglia and Mauricio Meismith.
STI stands for “Sistema de Telecomunicação Interativa” (interactive telecommunication system) and the BBS was mostly custom coded on top of a BBS software called RemoteAccess.
STI BBS was the first to offer a custom Instant Messaging feature called “Conectados”.[2]
When commercial Internet was finally available in 1995, STI BBS rebranded to STI Internet and transitioned to a pure ISP model.
STI Internet was the first to live stream audio in Brazil and also the first to offer unlimited internet access for a flat rate.[3]
During the market consolidation of global ISPs in the late 90s, STI Internet was acquired by PSINet.[1]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b "PSINet EXPANDS TO THIRD LARGEST INTERNET PROVIDER IN BRAZIL". PSINet. May 24, 1999. Archived from the original on October 8, 1999.
- ^ STI Conectados. YouTube. Retrieved January 3, 2025.
- ^ "Conteúdo é atrativo do STI". Folha de S.Paulo. July 16, 1999.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.