Draft:Casio fx-991 CW
Submission declined on 24 December 2024 by Ktkvtsh (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
The Casio fx-991 CW is a calculator manufactured by Casio designed for both educational and professional use. It is a part of Casio’s popular fx-991 series, which is known for its wide range of functions, ease of use, and reliability.
Key features
[edit]1. Natural Display (Textbook Display) – It shows mathematical expressions as they appear in textbooks, making it easier to understand and interpret calculations, especially for more complex equations.
2. Multi-replay Function – This allows you to go back and edit previous calculations, which can save time and make calculations more efficient.
3. Solar + Battery Power – It has both solar and battery power options, making it reliable in a variety of environments.
4. Advanced Mathematical Functions – It includes a wide range of functions for algebra, calculus, trigonometry, statistics, and other mathematical fields. This includes features such as fractions and mixed fractions, complex number calculations, differential and integral calculus, matrix operations, statistical analysis (mean, standard deviation, regression, etc.) and solving equations.
5. Fraction, Decimal, and Binary Mode – You can easily switch between different numerical representations, like fractions and decimals, which is particularly helpful for students.
6. Large Display – The display is large enough to show multiple lines of calculations, making it easier to read and understand your results.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.